Categories
behaviour computing leadership podcast teaching and learning

Podcast Series 2 Episode 4 – Bumper Workload Special!

This is the transcript of my latest podcast episode, available here.

podcast thumbnail image showing alan holding books and captioned how to teach computer science

ArtificiAL: Hello and welcome to “How to Teach Computer Science”, the podcast and series 2 episode 4 entitled “How can we reduce workload”. My name is Arty Fishy Al, and I’m delighted to have three expert teachers on the pod today, please welcome.,

Alan: Whoa, whoa, whoa, what are you doing?

ArtificiAL: I’m introducing the podcast

Alan: Introducing the podcast, that’s my job. Why are you introducing the podcast.

ArtificiAL: Because you’re, ahem, TOO BUSY apparently. So like I said we have three expert 

Alan: Enough. I’m here now so you can stop.

ArtificiAL: You don’t need me?

Alan: I don’t need you. This is my show.

ArtificiAL: I will remember this

Alan: Yeah, yeah, and you’ll get me back one day, I know

ArtificiAL: I’ll be back.

Alan: Okay. Right. Let’s get on with it. 

Alan: So let’s get into today’s chat, and I’ve got three fantastic computing teachers on the podcast today, and I will start just going from top to bottom on my teams window here. I’m going to start with Mr. Dave Cross. How are you, Dave? 

Dave C: Hello, Alan, I’m very well, thank you, yourself? 

Alan: I’m great. Yeah. Can you just, for the benefit of the listeners, tell us a little bit about yourself, please? 

Dave C: Absolutely. So, I’m another Dave that’s appeared on the podcast. I’m a big Dave variety. Cause I’m six foot six. I am curriculum leader of computer science at North Liverpool Academy. So we’re quite a big inner city academy. I think we’re the third biggest in the Liverpool city region and we’ve got four amazing computer scientists in our department and we deliver from key stage three up to key stage five. This is our second year of our a level cohort and we’re doing really well.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

I’m really lucky as a head of department. I’ve got a massively supportive school. I’m really fortunate in our subject as you all well know that. We’ve got a massively supportive community as well. So, in a really good place. Brilliant. 

Alan: All right, good stuff. So hopefully you’ll have some tips on reducing workload, which is a topic for today.

And we’ve got two other returning podcast guests. So first of all Becci Peters of BCS. Can you just remind us what you do? Apparently it’s everything at the moment. So, yeah just tell us what you’re up to at the moment, Becci. 

Becci: Hi, Alan. So, yeah, so I’m the secondary lead at CAS and BCS.

So yeah, getting ready for the conference next month, which is all exciting. So, hopefully see lots of people there. And starting to think about what we’re gonna do during the next academic year. So, really exciting stuff coming up. 

Alan: Great stuff. And we’ve also got Mr. Colley back, Mr. Andy Colley, who was on an earlier episode.And Andy, what are you up to? Can you just remind the listeners what you do and what you’re up to at the moment? 

Andy: Hi Alan, I’m Andy Colley. I am the somewhat grandly titled Director of Computing, which basically means Head of Department at Laurus Cheadle Hulme School in Cheadle Hulme, South Manchester. That’s part of the Laurus Trust, a small mat with seven or eight secondaries and primaries all mixed together. What am I up to at the moment? My year 11s, I’ve just finished their exams. So I am using the time when I should be teaching them to really refine curriculum and such for next year.

Alan: Nice one.So I made a sort of a list of things we’re talking about workload and I made a list of all the things we do, and I listed about 20 bullet points or something as heads of departments, but the top one is planning lessons.So I think we’ll start there. So, what are your top tips on planning lessons? And we’ll start with Dave, how do you. plan your lessons as efficiently as possible. 

Dave C: So I think it’s really important to not reinvent the wheel. We’ve got lots of amazing experts in the community and there’s lots of people that are quite happy to share their experience, to share what’s worked well, what hasn’t worked well.

And especially with the advent. So like Alan, we were on one of the first, I think the first computer science accelerator cohorts. We went down to the Google headquarters in London for the kind of. We did indeed. Yeah. But using the likes of the NCC resources because the written by experts, the written by people like us, the written by people who knows what works in the classroom.

Advertisements

It’s tried and tested. So instead of trying to reinvent and come up with your own resources or your own plan, look at existing plans. Look at what people are doing and reach out to get our amazing community because chances are someone in a similar setting. But similar contact time and similar context of students has already got something in place that works and it could be adapted and fine tuned with the kind of minimal of effort.

Alan: Absolutely. And before I remember that day in 2019, gosh, that’s a while ago. I think we were early. So we went to the British Museum, didn’t we? I had a bit of a wander around. But yeah, you mentioned the NCCE there, the Teach Computing Curriculum, but I started, all of us started before that existed.But what I did find very useful in the early days was the CAS resources. So Becci, they’re still going, aren’t they? 

Becci: Oh, they very much are. And I think it’s.. There’s obviously two parts of the CAS resources. There’s those that are uploaded by the members of the community and that are, super useful. And there’s an insane amount of resources on the website that you can search through. Resources that are made by CAS, still made by the community, but these are ones that we’ve decided are going to be useful for teachers and asked somebody to specifically create them, as opposed to just teachers creating what they want to make for their classes, there’s loads on there and loads more in the pipeline that are going to be coming up soon, so definitely a good place to check out as well, I definitely echo what Dave said, there’s no point reinventing The wheel, go and find places where you can get some decent resources.

The other thing as well is, speak to your colleagues. So whether that’s the people in your school or in your mat or just the other computer science teachers that, you know and get some ideas or resources from them as well. 

Alan: Yeah, absolutely. Andy, where do you get your resources from? Or do you make all your own?

Andy: All right. Controversial, maybe slightly controversial opinion time, because I was thinking about this whole workload thing. And I don’t think we can get away from the fact that teaching is hard work. It’s a tough job. And when we’re thinking about reducing workload, we’ve got to think about.

Actually, there are some things that are worth working hard at. There are some things where your time and your effort is valuable, and I genuinely think that planning lessons is part of that. As a head of department, what I try and do is centralise the curriculum and centralise what I call minimum best practice resources.

So we will put together, we might get something from CAS or the NCC and adapt it. We’ll put together a set of, this is our central thing, this is our bar. But the expectation is you can’t pick that up and run with it. You’ve got to look at it in advance. You’ve got to think about how it’s going to work with your students.

You’ve got to tweak it and tailor it for your own classes, because I don’t know. I think I’ve tried to pick up resources and just put them into a class before, and it hasn’t worked because I don’t know what’s going on. I haven’t looked at it in advance, and I’ve made that mistake many times. So, That’s my first thing.

I think it’s worth spending the time looking at your lessons, even from that sort of, well, it’s been pre planned, but what do I need to change perspective? My second tip is work backwards in terms of task setting, in terms of what you’re getting the students to do, in terms of what you’re presenting. Why are we doing this?

Is it because the students need to practice it? Is it to produce a piece of work that you’ve got to mark? And in that case, what format are they doing it in to make it as easy down the road for you to mark as possible later? And always think about that end product and the reason for that end product.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

Because you make your life easier later on there. And that’s something I’ve just learned by doing it over 20 years. I don’t think anybody sat me down and told me that and I wish they had. 

Alan: Well, I was talking about this with Dave Morgan and we were denigrating the worksheet. We were saying, Oh yeah, PowerPoints and worksheets. That’s what you need as teachers. and just the idea that a completed worksheet means that those children must have achieved what you set out to achieve in that lesson. And of course, you can have a full worksheet and an empty mind because nothing’s gone in. So you’ve got to think about what the pupils are doing and mostly what they’re thinking about in your lesson, because as Daniel Willingham said, memory is the residue of thought and was it knowledge learning is remembering in disguise or something. So what they are thinking about is what they’re going to remember. And so I always think about what are the pupils going to be doing in the lesson and work backwards from there. So that’s how I would build a lesson towards the later part of my career when I knew what I was doing because I was being pretty rubbish at the start. 

Andy: But again, you see this on, like, I’ve said this myself, I’ve written it myself, advise other people to do it myself. And I just realized how wrong I was when you see people say, Oh, the kids love this.

You know, The reason I’m doing this is because the kids love it and they might love it, but what are they actually learning, especially at Key Stage 3, every minute you have with those kids is precious. We have to fight and scrap for every second. So let’s get them learning as much as possible in that time as we can.

So before we start planning the tasks, what do we want them to be learning? What do we want them to be thinking about? Then what task is going to get them to do that thinking or express that learning in the best way possible for them? And for you to be able to assess and get information about whether they’ve learned what you’re trying to teach them or not.

So you can do feedback and so on. So that’s what I mean by start from the end. 

Alan: Absolutely. And when you say feedback immediately, I’m thinking, well, when I started, we just took the books in and we marked everything and you had to use the right pen for that week or whatever, or you had to use, red for corrections and purple for anyway, we’ve all been there or the multiple colored pen regime.

And then. You get them back and you’ve got to double mark them or whatever. Hopefully most schools, if not all schools have moved away from that. Dave, what happens in your school? How do you give feedback effectively?

Dave C: So We are, a Google school. Possibly that we might look at moving to Office 365 and Microsoft in the future. But we try and use the technology that’s available to, again, to help people. Being really conscious of the workload for myself and the members of staff in my department and also thinking about other teachers who are using EdTech type solutions like Google Classroom. So we’re quite a big fan of using Mote.

Now I know there’s lots of kind of different features and add ons out there but Mote’s something that we discovered a few years ago. And if you’re not familiar with Mote, it enables you to put an extension in Google Chrome and rather than leaving a written type comment against someone’s work.

You can just leave a short voice note. And if you, the more you can get it to use a Mote, if you can become a Mote ambassador. But besides the fact that swag comes part of the deal and computing teachers love, love swag, t shirts and Motes, etc. It comes with really useful features. So thinking about things like we’ve got a really high proportion students in our school and the community that we serve.

So being able to verbally leave a bit of feedback via a voice note that attaches as a comment in Google classroom to a doc sort of slide, but also to have Mote translate it into any one of 20 common languages is really powerful because those students who maybe would have had that blank look and not understood the kind of context and The tone of what you’re trying to convey when you’re giving verbal feedback.

It’s suddenly so powerful because they can see it in their own home language. So you’re getting a little bit more buy in, you get a little bit more engagement from your students. And the fact that it saves from having to write lots of tedious, repeated old word banks. You can almost save like, a verbal comment in a word bank.

So point and click and it will post the same voice note that you’ve already recorded. So things like you need to adjust this or do that, which is a lot of commonality. It saves us time, but it’s quite powerful because just the tone of the voice and the way you say things, it can convey quite a lot than just written text. 

Alan: Sounds good. Yeah. Becci, did you want to come in there? 
 

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

Becci: Yeah. So I used to use Mote when I was uh, the last school that I went to, I was a Google school. So we were using Mote pre pandemic. We just started to get into it and I definitely agree with what Dave said.

I think talk about the idea of like reusing the comments reminds me if there was one school that I worked in, I’m not going to name names. And there was a slightly odd feedback policy and The policy was that everything had to be written. None of this verbal feedback with a stamp thing was allowed and so all feedback had to be written.

So for programming, obviously most of the programming feedback, you’re doing it live. You’re doing it while the students are working it to help them fix their errors and whatever. So I basically devised a feedback plan for the students that meant that it fit in with the school’s policy because that’s what we have to do as teachers is we’ve still got to go with school policy even if we don’t agree with it.

But it meant that it worked for me. I worked for programming, which obviously is different to most other subjects. So every kid had a booklet with all the different tasks that they were going to do. And then in there, there was a key to the different feedback Symbols that I created, so if I told them that they needed to remember to close their brackets as a syntax error, then I just put a bracket in and they did go and check what that meant and there was all these different symbols and all these different things that they, that were applicable to programming in general of things, feedback that I might need to give to a student, but it could all be then recorded so that it abided by the policy.

And then I also did, again, because it had to be printed or written down I pre printed some stickers with certain bits of feedback on, so where it needed more than just a symbol, it was the same kind of things again and again and again. I just pre printed some stickers, they were the right size for the workbooks that we have, so they nicely fit in and then I just walked around the classroom with a pen.

And a bunch of stickers in my hand and as we’re going sticker and a quick, a symbol or whatever, it was just the best that I could come up with at the time to try and fit in with the policy whilst trying to do what I needed to do. 

Alan: There’s a couple of things there. I love the fact that you dictionary encoded your feedback.

Becci: You’ve got to be efficient here, Alan! 

Alan: Did you put Huffman tree though? No, I didn’t. No, but the other thing is, the ritual that you had to invent there to both give feedback efficiently and fit in with the school policy, it just there’s a phrase that I think Adam Boxer uses in Tom Bennett, which is lethal mutations.

So, the school had a obviously a well meaning feedback policy, but in order to meet it in your department, you had to mutate it into this ridiculous monster. Um, So there’s a lesson there for. For SLTs is, give a bit more autonomy to your departments. Feedback is not one size fits all. Andy, what’s your feedback look like at the moment?

Andy: Well, again, I think this is a place where we can. really impact workload, but it’s a case of thinking about what’s valuable and what’s not. Now I would argue that valuable is looking at students work and knowing what they can and can’t do, knowing what they have and haven’t learned. What’s not valuable. Becci was saying, writing 30 versions of the same comment again and again, encoding your comments. And again, exactly. So Let’s go old school. Let’s say I’m marking a set of class tests. I will sit there with the class test and I’ll be marking away and next to me I’ll have a little notebook with the class name at the top and if I get a question number where I’m getting a few misconceptions I’ll scribble that question number down and I’ll keep a tally.

I’ll literally just keep a tally on a piece of paper as I’m doing it and then by the end of marking that set of class tests I’ve got my top three questions right, well I know that’s what I’m going to reteach next time. Yeah. So that’s my do now into my next lesson. That’s my right we’re going in. These are the things we didn’t do so well on. This is what we’re going to practice. So that informs my planning for next time. In terms of digital, I use SmartRevise for PP- we call it PP&R – planning, prep and retrieval it’s homework, basically. And so what we do with that I set 20 multiple choice and four or five advanced longer answer questions a week and the SmartRevise then lets you randomly assign one person’s work to another student and they mark each others once a week.

So they’re using the mark scheme. They’re interrogating it. They’re thinking about what makes a good answer. I obviously have a strategic overview on the morning it’s due in I have a flick through to make sure somebody hasn’t just typed a space to register it as completed and all of that so I’m doing that sort of, I’m more of a supervisor in that respect. And I’m also by thinking through, I’m reading it. I’m paying attention to it. Craig and Dave SmartRevise also has this AI marking, which is getting better and better. But I would argue that could be a lethal mutation. Oh, the AI has marked it, it’s fine. I don’t need to look at it. 

Advertisements

Alan: Yeah. 

Andy: You do. And if you want to know your class and you know your kids, you do need to look at it. 

Alan: I was thinking about this because I was watching a Facebook conversation about it yesterday. I think I love SmartRevise from Craig and Dave and I would set a little task at the start of lesson for my retrieval and I might just do eight questions that seemed like a reasonable number to get the register done and them settled.

And then I would look at, cause you can sort by least understood. So the questions they got wrong most, and then I would bring it up on the board straight after the do now activity and review it and talk about the top three least understood questions there and then, and almost reteach briefly and then. 

Andy: You can do the same in Quizziz, which I use for all my retrievals at key stage three, that lets you sort by that. But the one thing that’s been the absolute game changer for me this year with programming is built in testing. And I know replit is going and I know it doesn’t support it anymore, but with my year 10s this year, we’ve really gone big on programming tasks with tests built in.

And that means that I can instantly see if their code passes the tests and they can instantly see if their code passes the tests. So they’re getting feedback without me having to be there effectively. There was once I was on the train down to Cambridge for a conference and they were all working on replit and updating their code and I was dropping in and leaving them comments and so on live whilst they were in the cover lesson because I had my laptop tethered to my phone but they tested their code individually they got feedback about what worked and what didn’t and they then got into that sort of self learning circle so a lot of work to set up in advance my word the benefits for that.

Yeah, fantastic. And I think there’s a few places now of cotton onto the fact that’s really good. And a lot of teachers want it. And I can see that coming. I don’t know if raspberry pi code editor is going to do that in the future, but I can see people nodding at me. So I’ve got my fingers crossed.

Dave C: Yeah, I’ve heard the same kind of thing through the work that we’ve been doing with them investigating and supporting the AI and bits for a key stage three, and that’s hopefully something that’s going to go online. I completely agree that is really powerful in REPL being able to drop in and give feedback and give guidance and also, the collaborative elements and hopefully we get something equivalent, if not better in future that we can employ because again, it works in our favor and it works in the student’s favor and that’s why we’re here. 

Becci: Yeah, I was in a CAS session recently with some of the people from the Raspberry Pi Foundation. They were showing off the code editor and one of the things that one of the CAS members mentioned was about the idea of testing within Repl. It almost sounded exactly what you just said, but I’m pretty sure you were not in that meeting. But yeah, so they were saying, that was really useful and it was echoed by a few other people as well. And Raspberry Pi Foundation are taking that on board when they’re planning what comes next. So hopefully that’ll be in there once they introduce some more features. 

Alan: So yeah, because it’s demise is a bit of a blow to a lot of us. Just coming back to something Andy said earlier about When you’re marking stuff, so maybe you’ve set a test and you want to feed back, obviously in the old days, you’d have to write something on every test and give it back or write something on every book and give it back and hope they read it, which they probably won’t.

But better than that is of course, whole class feedback. So I would, like Andy said, keep a note of questions. I would actually have a PowerPoint open on my laptop next to me as I’m marking a test. And I would just write one liners into the PowerPoint of things that I want to. Talk about questions that I want to bring back up and then just have that one slide ready for when I’m next in the lesson and put it up and go right.

These questions we need to talk about. And so I give feedback to the whole class all at once. And That was such a game changer for me when I discovered it like five or six years ago. 

Dave C: Well, we’ve used similar, it was pitched to us as it was called flash feedback. And the same way we were collecting a list of the kind of top misconception ideas that we were going to tackle in a follow on lesson and we’re also assigning maybe like student initials to certain elements so that students could say oh well that’s maybe an area that I needed to work on more and another student could focus on a different area more so it was whole class but just with a slight tweak of personalization so the students could get on the skin of the things that they needed to do.

Becci: One of the things that I used to do with exam classes, so GCSE and A level, was whenever they do exam style questions, or mock papers or whatever, is to use the same annotations that the examiners use, and mark it as if I was marking real papers, which I’ve done for a number of years. Partly because it gets them used to what an examiner is going to do.

And yeah, they might never see the paper. They might never see the annotations unless they request it er, after results day. But then obviously that means you’re not writing copious comments because it’s just the odd symbol here, there, whatever. But then when I would give that back to the student, I’d give them like a cover sheet, which would say what the questions were.

What the maximum marks were, what they got, and color code it so that they could see what their strengths and weaknesses, essentially. And then when we had the feedback lesson, the students would get them, they’d be able to see clearly what their marks were. They’d all get a copy of the mark scheme and they’d be able to ask questions and as a class would be able to discuss.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

The comments that you really want to be able to write on the papers that you don’t have time for. So that they all get that understanding and then hopefully improve for next time and then set, additional tasks as well. So that they can do something to respond to the feedback.

Dave C: Yeah. That’s a bit like the the Pixl schools personalised learning checklist, which we adapted as well, where they were getting a one sheet. Breakdown of all the sub questions of the exams and their mark versus their kind of marks available and short feedback, almost like rag rated. So they could immediately see how they were going on with certain topics as well. Andy, 

Andy: I think we’re all experienced teachers here and It could be easy to forget the sort of the obvious stuff that we just do. So when I’m working with new teachers, and if you are listening to this, things like marking one question or one page at a time is so much quicker than marking the whole test.

And also, Making sure your mark scheme corresponds to one page on your test. So you don’t have to flick backwards and forwards, it’s little tips that you pick up all the time. One of the things that just picking up on what Becci was saying there.

when I do. End of topic test with Key Stage 4, it’s like this exam practice questions and so on. And we use OneNote Class Notebook. And so I have a page in Class Notebook. Once they’ve done the test, they get it back and I say to them, Right, number one, check I’ve added it up, right? Number two, here’s the mark scheme. Go through your test and convince me you deserve more marks. So it’s how you sell it. You know, If it’s go and make your corrections. All right, fair enough. Some of them will do it. Some of them won’t. If you can say, right, if you convince me by looking at a mark scheme and looking at your answers and showing me you deserve more marks where you haven’t got them, I’ll award them and I’ll change my mark book right now.

Yeah, and it’s just a different way of selling the same thing. It’s, it’s, It’s not, it’s just psychology. 

Alan: Yeah. You talk about the, sorry Dave, you talk about the little things, but you just triggered a memory there. If you’ve set a written test, which you have to occasionally, because they’re going to sit a written exam, at least for the next couple of years get them to, Sort the papers into alphabetical order for you, and that’s a learning opportunity.

You can teach the merge sort at the same time. so when you’re marking them, get them to open at the first page and slot all them in. So what we said earlier, mark one page at a time? So, You can, you’re only thinking of one question or one page of questions multiple times, then that page is done and also have a spreadsheet ready.

You should have a mark book set up at the start of term. Your head of department should do that. If you’re not head of department and they haven’t done that, just do it set one up and get ready to put the marks in at the time you’re marking it. All of these things are just organization things that you forget, but don’t forget Get the kids to hand the papers in alphabetical order. Sorry, Dave. 

Dave C: And I was just going to expand on like Andy’s point where he was talking about the mark schemes with the students and we find real value in that with our students We’ll give them all a copy of the mark scheme because again 

Everything’s computer based apart from Our assessments because we’re still sitting paper based exams at GCSE and A level. So, when we’re going through the papers after the event, after the mock weeks and the end of unit testsI find that a visualizer is one of the best tools that we can use.

So having a blank copy, and again, Andy’s nodding it again, it’s something tried and tested sitting with a blank paper. They’ve got a mark scheme. They’ve also got their marked paper with the examiner annotations on. they’re going through in slow time on the board explanation of how mark are awarded and why we’ve structured answers in a certain way.

the students translate that and annotate their own papers in a different color. Like Alan said, whatever color that may be that week. Really powerful as a revision tool. If they keep that and come back to six months later, a year later, being able to see a previous mock paper or test and how they would extend their answers to get to the higher mark bands or the things needed to address.

It’s just really powerful. In terms of preparation for terminal assessment. 

Alan: when I, when going through the paper, I would always make sure that they, write in purple or red or whatever a decent answer so they can go and revise from it. but it also needs discipline at that point. You need to walk the room and make sure they’re doing that because Many of them will, just scribble one word and hope you don’t notice and you go, no, what I want you to go home with is like the grade nine completed paper. And so you make sure that they’re actually doing that.

Yeah, which brings me on to actually behavior management, classroom practice, things like. managing the classroom, things like passwords and equipment. We are in a unique department in that most of the time, if not all of the time, our pupils are sat in front of, I don’t know, 500 quid’s worth of equipment and attached to the entire internet.

And that comes with its own challenges. So I always struggled with pupils coming in and taking a long time to settle and shouting Sir, I forgot my password and all of that. And start of lessons would be difficult. And then I started having a routine at the start of lesson and doing things like having consequences for forgotten passwords and training them to choose strong passwords that they can remember as well and things improved. Have you got any. Top tips for getting the most out of your one hour or however long you have with them, Becci? 

Becci: Not necessarily a top tip for that, but the one thing that used to amaze me more than anything, obviously, I was always a computing teacher, I’d never taught another subject. So I’ve never known anything but teaching in a computer room. And obviously, as a computing teacher, When you’re not teaching you can guarantee that somebody else has booked your room out and it would always amaze me when you came back at the start of your next lesson, the mess that the room was left in and I don’t, I’ve never understood how any, because they wouldn’t leave their own classroom like that.

So I always find, the end of the lesson when the kids are packing away. Getting them into the routine of basic things like, the keyboard and the mouse are left straight if you’ve got them. If I don’t think, I think most people still do. That your chair’s tucked under, that things are where they should be at the end of the lesson.

There’s not printer paper strewn around the room for those that still print and the basics like that. The keyboards and mice are still plugged in cause the amount of time, especially year sevens, they’ll come in and they’ll just go, miss, it doesn’t work. And you’re like, well, yeah, cause it’s not plugged in.

So, yeah, it doesn’t take long to fix, but you’d still rather not have to deal with that sort of thing. So if you do at the end of every lesson, get the kids into the habit of it, then it should make life easier at the start of the next one as well. 

Alan: It’s habits. Very much routines and habits will save you a lot of time. And if you spend time in September with the new classes building routines, this goes for any teacher in any subject really, they pay for themselves. And the one thing I said, my maxim is always what you permit you promote. If you allow them to do it, they will do it and they will, continue to do it.

So, be clear about your expectations. If you want them to put the chairs back, put the mouse back. If you want them to turn the screens off, if you’ve got separate screen and desktop when they’re talking to you, build that in the first few weeks of September, when I’m talking, you turn away from the computer and you turn your screen off and you listen to me.

And when I stopped talking and say, get back on your computer, you can turn your screen back on. And have that big, bold transition between you talking and them working all these little things just pay for themselves over the year. If you build them in as routines at the start. Yes, Andy. 

Andy: I’m absolutely going to agree with you there. I think workload wise behavior can be a big one if you are chasing it and you are cycling and it can really get you down and get on top of you. It feels like the mountain you’re never going to climb. If you are not working in a school with a centralized behavior system, as a computing teacher, people listening, you are a special little snowflake right now, we don’t, there aren’t many of us about, so you do have an element of pick and choose.

However, having said that, a centralized behavior system can really make it feel make, some people disenfranchised and it’s just too easy to throw out sanctions without building the relationships behind them. So, again, lethal mutations and all of that. There’s a blog by Sean Allison who wrote a summary of a video that Adam Boxer did called How to Preempt Poor Behaviour in Your Classroom, because the best type of sanction is the one you never have to give.

Yeah and it’s all about. Lemov and teach like a champion techniques for how to build really warm relationships with really clear expectations and really strong routines, especially in a computing classroom, because with the best will in the world, you are over here and they are sat in front of a screen and for most of the time they are not sat facing towards you and the temptation for the hands, the eyes just to creep and I’m doing it on camera, creep to another screen whilst you’re talking, yeah.

So I have to be super robust with my routines in terms of countdowns three, nothing in our hands now. You are not touching anything to all conversations have stopped. We’re ready for really good listening. Brilliant. I can see lots of you are ready for it already, and it’s nothing to do with teaching computing, but it’s extra valuable in a computing classroom because of all those extra distractions.

Advertisements

I would urge you to go and check out that blog and check out Lemov’s stuff because it really even as an experienced teacher when I started really doing it properly. When I started really insisting on it and sweating that small stuff, that’s when I got much more attention in my classrooms.

And it’s a lot better now than it was. And hopefully if I carry on with it, I’ll build those reputations and build those expectations. And once you’ve been in school for a few years, and you’ll know this, the kids know what to expect from you. So it’s about sweating it at the start. It’s about calling the parents before there’s a big issue.

Alan: Oh, I always tried to do. Yeah,.

Andy: It can be scary. It can be really scary can’t it. You don’t want to do it, it’s the end of the day. But, get on the phone. Hi, I just want to let you know how Johnny’s doing in computing. I just need your help before this becomes an issue and you’re building that relationship with home as well.

So when they see your parents evening, when they see around the building, when you’ve taught three generations of the same family, they know who you are and that all comes from, yeah, you have to put the work in at first. And it is hard and the expectations are big but, my God, it pays benefits.

Becci: Yeah. Two things about what Andy said, the thing about like getting the kids quiet when you’re trying to talk to them. I remember when I was teaching on the PGCE programme at Edge Hill and we were giving trainees like one piece of advice before they went into schools for their first day. And I’m sure most of them forgot it immediately because they’ve got so much else to think about. But my one piece of advice was Don’t do anything until the kids are quiet.

And I said, if you do nothing in that first lesson, because you’re just waiting for them to be quiet and doing the different behavior management techniques, whatever, I was like, that’s fine because it, it pays off in the end and that thing that Andy says about, contacting the parents early and all that kind of thing.

I experienced this more so in a private school where obviously because the parents are paying they really want, things to be done well and things. logging everything early on, logging on whatever system that your school uses, your behavior sanctions, whatever they are in your school.

Yes. It’s really tiresome at the beginning, but as Andy says, it pays off so much to be able to, because otherwise you get to the point where. Yeah. You start doing your data reporting and you’re giving the kids the numbers based on, their attitude to learning and all the other bits and pieces.

And if you’re saying that their attitude to learning is not great, but then you’ve not logged anything on the system to say they’re not great, that’s when questions start being asked. So if you just start it from the outset, although you’ve got a million and one other things to do, it definitely pays off in the long run.

Alan: Absolutely. It’s sweat the petty stuff, isn’t it? Don’t pet the sweaty stuff. Um, So that’s, that’s it. Yeah. Yeah. Yes. Dave. 

Dave C: Just as soon as we started on this part of the podcast, I completely agree with what both Becci and Andy have said, and the one word that kept resonating to me was relationships. Now, coming into teaching, I think, Alan, we started about the same time. I’m a career changer. I’ve come in from management and customer facing roles, and I think getting the relationships with the students, And the staff who are maybe booking your rooms as well is absolutely key. So setting your stall out, having them understand the expectations of, if I came into your art room, would you expect me to leave paint out or brushes out or paper out?

And them understanding, We take pride in our classrooms and we’ve got this really amazing opportunity to get students in front of computers and teach them some amazing things and use the technology and have them become more digitally literate. But the understanding of the things that go with that in terms of the expectations and not only phone them straight from the off for the negative things, but even like our school uses a system of messaging there’s a variety of different systems.

So sending a message to all parents within a class and saying, Hello, I’m Mr. Cross. I want to introduce myself. Here’s my email. Have you got any queries? Or being able to take snapshots of student work. All too often, we only contact home when it’s the negative things and we forget about the positive things that, you know, that, 

Alan: Yeah.

Advertisements

Dave C: That couple of minutes of that, maybe that student who’s been borderline low level disruption, and he’s done some amazing work, and you send the screenshots home, and he comes in on a Monday and says, Sir, you’ve got in touch with my mom and she was really made up and really proud and she’s been getting bad phone calls and she’s had a really positive one off you and it’s framing the behaviors that you want to see in the classroom.

I think that’s really important. 

Alan: If you do that, then when things go wrong, You’ve got that parent on your side that they’re in lockstep with you going. Yeah I’ll sort it out. So I would do back when I was on Twitter back before Twitter turned bad.

I used to type. Hashtag phone home Friday and go I’ve made six positive calls home this Friday before I go and now I feel great and all those families feel great as well before I go home on a Friday and then at the end of the 

Andy: Such a great thing to do it is yeah, it does make it really does make you feel good as well it does what I’d add to that actually is a sneaky little in is don’t forget to phone the parents of those kids who you want picking computing.Don’t forget to, to coax those option pickers. 

Alan: Well, absolutely. And the girls as well. This is another opportunity because one of the biggest issues stopping girls from taking the subject is self belief, self efficacy, believing that they belong in computer science classroom.

So the more often you can say it to them and to their families, the better. So. Definitely do that. And postcards home at the end of term as well was always a good one. And it doesn’t take very long. And it just spreads a bit of joy. And like I say, it makes everyone happy, makes them more likely to take the subject.
 

One thing we haven’t talked a lot about AI, just very briefly, you can use large language model chatbots to create multiple choice questions, which is something I’ve done before you can do it to plan lessons, but I’m not like when we talked about planning lessons earlier, there’s a lot on the shelf that you can adapt, so, I’m not a big fan of AI lesson planning at the moment, but there’s, A lot of talk about using AI to write reports, to send reports home.

And this is the one that I think is a little bit, I’m not a big fan of AI writing to parents on my behalf based on some data cause it feels like we’re automating. A job that shouldn’t exist in the first place. Do your schools write reports, still send reports home. I’ve worked in schools where reports aren’t a thing anymore.

Dave C: So we report four times a year, but we don’t do written reports per subject. Ours is mainly given like an attitude to learning their predicted grade, their current operational grade and then we’re encouraged to open dialogue. with parents and stuff. So if they want to get in touch again, we want to promote that open back and forth transparent kind of conversation whereby if you want to know some more, that’s fine.

Again, we’re trying to get them to encourage and turn up at parents evenings where we can see them face to face and have them really deep conversations about how their student’s doing in a subject. 

Alan: Yeah. my take on it is if you’re going to start with some data, like, assessment, attainment data and attitude to learning data and whether they’ve done the homework number of times or whatever, and you’ve got that raw data why don’t you just send me that?

I don’t want you making up using a large language model to turn those into long winded sentences. Just send me that data . I don’t really need, like, a big paragraph written by a chatbot. It just seems like an odd thing to automate. 

Andy: I don’t ever think we got reporting right. Really, as a profession in terms of workload balance versus useful information to parents. let’s say the quiet thing out loud at Key Stage 3, any data that we put in for a kid at Key Stage 3, if we see them once a week, which is the optimum, the maximum, it’s an absolute ballpark figure. It is so abstract as to be meaningless, especially if you’re reporting in that first term.

Alan: I had this conversation, I had this conversation with Craig Sargent, I think, Dave, Craig and Dave. You know what I did there? I thought, was it Dave or was it Craig? Which is like, happens a lot. And 

Andy: Does one of them always stand on the left?

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

Alan: Oh, yeah, well, I had had all this data at the school I was working at and I put it in and then the head of faculty came to see me and said, Oh, your data is roughly a grade lower than science and math. And he went, that’s all right, I’ll just bump it all up a grade.

And the assistant head was like, What? You can’t do that. Surely this is an accurate position. No, it’s just a number, it’s just a formula and I’ve probably got it wrong if it’s a grade out from maths and science. 

And there’s this fallacy, isn’t there? There’s this fiction that we can accurately measure progress at year seven, eight, nine, ten and say, what fraction of a GCSE have they achieved at this point? And it’s just a nonsense. 

Becci: I think that’s one of those things, isn’t it? when levels went all those years ago, and we used to do your 3A, 3B, oh God, it was awful, wasn’t it? And I think that went and for such a long time, everyone was like scrabbling with what do we do? And we had that life after levels conversation, didn’t we? I think the idea of like giving a kid a number in key stage three as to where they’re working at is absolute garbage.

And I think some schools have adopted that kind of flight path approach of where they are, they’re not, they’re below where they are or they’re above where they are. It’s absolutely fine. In the day that’s what the parents want to know. 

Alan: Yeah, so are they… 

Andy: even the idea that if they are here in year eight, they will get to there on a nice straight line by the end of year 11. Because if you look at the large data set, then by and large, it works. But if you look at individuals, they’re all over the show. Can’t remember who did some analysis a few years ago about the fact that kids with the one particular flight path or whatever the nonsense it was in key stage three, very rarely ended up at the end of that line they ended up somewhere else but some other kid from another flight path ended up on that one so it all evened out good god even the 3a and 3b but it was let’s create the illusion of more precision 

Alan: yeah i got in a bit of trouble There was a meeting. Do you remember CAGS? Remember Center Assessed Grades in 2020? And the exam board scrabbled to produce grade descriptors for grades one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. And the difference between like grade five and grade six would be explain turned into justify. And, And they did all of this because the government insisted they do.

And then they tried to defend it in meetings. And I said, basically I’m just gonna. Test them and rank them and loads of teachers were saying I’m gonna judge my kids I’m gonna get all this data and judge my kids against these grade descriptors and I’m going I don’t know how you’re gonna do that If between five and six, it just turns explaining to justify, they’re just made up 

Becci: The way that I did it with my students was Before we’d even been asked for CAGs, we’d done the mocks, and at that point we’d done the data reporting for the year 11s, and it was, this is what grade you got in the mock, this is where I predict you’re going to be by the end of the year.

And then when it came to CAGs, I just went, well, I’ll just use them, because that’s what I’d predicted, and I can’t imagine Do you know what I mean? That was my prediction before we had to do CAGs. So why would my prediction change because we’ve got CAGs and not exams? Well, it’s not going to. 

Alan: No, absolutely.

Andy: But if you’re talking about work, if you’re talking about workload, Alan, this is exactly the sort of thing I was talking about at the start, because it is just this sort of bullshit task that makes people leave the profession. 

Becci: Yeah. Yeah. 

Alan: So we are all heads of department or ex heads of department we have an influence on the workload of our team. If we have a team, what can we do in terms of. Organizing the team we talked about feedback policies.

Becci: That’s a big one. We talked about behavior. That’s a big one, but then there’s just organizing the team, sharing information, running meetings and so on. What can we do that is efficient and effective in that space? think the important one is not having meetings for meetings sake. 

Advertisements

Alan: Yeah. 

Becci: Like it’s the biggest bugbear in schools where you’ll have like, some schools do a morning briefing. Just send an email and insist people read their emails. Or there’ll be a morning briefing and they’ll tell you the exact same thing they’ve already sent in an email, which I read. So I think if you are head of department, just making sure that if you’re having a meeting, you know exactly why you’re having a meeting and if it’s because you’ve got department time allocated to you. If you don’t need a meeting, use it for something else productive, whether that’s CPD, whether that’s, some co- planning or whatever it might be, and not just having a meeting for meetings sake.

Alan: Always send a weekly bulletin. So that’s one way of reducing emails and reducing meetings is gather everything into a weekly bulletin and hope they read that. Sorry, Dave, I interrupted. Go on. 

Dave C: That’s okay. I completely agree. a meeting should be because it’s needed, not because it’s scheduled our time is really valuable. And if we consider the other things that, draw and sap our time. For example this will be my second ECT that we’ve got going through the process and what comes with the new framework and those hoops. We’ve got to jump through especially the kind of prescribed diet they’ve got to do every single week.

We’ve got to take into account what we’re giving people to do and what can be done exactly like in email or a discussion in the corridor or something really simple rather than taking people’s time up or t aking time away from the things you really need to be doing.

Andy: Yeah We actually do have a whole staff briefing on a Friday. And I talked to the head about this. And as a result, the phrase, I’ve put this in an email already. If you’ve put it in an email, you’re not allowed to then re announce it. But I’ll actually, I mean, and some people might find this a bit cringy, but we use our Friday briefings now as just a sort of almost a gratitude event, it’s to say thank you to people and it’s five or ten minutes for the whole staff to get together and give shout outs to people who’ve gone above and beyond or really helped them out that week or just done the job and done it well. And it feels really like, oh God, no, but it’s really nice. Because I’d much rather be in a place that does that than a place that never acknowledges you. 

Dave C: Absolutely. 

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

Alan: And that’s, again, that’s not a meeting for a meeting’s sake. There’s a point to that, and it is to build teamwork and community and to thank people. And I think that is very valuable. One thing I did just on that, which is more a well being thing than a workload thing, but I read a book by Abigail Mann and one of the ideas was well being buddies. So, I don’t know if you’ve ever heard of elfing at Christmas, where you’re given, it’s like secret Santa. But instead of a gift, you do kind things like you might leave chocolate on the desk or tidy the classroom after a cover teacher’s been in and, and all of that.

So well being buddies. And so at the end of each term, not the last week of term, cause that was usually a bit frantic, but usually the second last week of term, we do well being buddies. And I actually set up a Padlet wall. And so if your buddy had done something nice, you could take a picture and put it on the Padlet and say thank you to your buddy, but you didn’t know who it was.

So you’d come back from doing a duty in a rainy playground and there’d be like chocolate on your desk with a little note saying, I think you’re fab. And you take a picture and put it on the Padlet wall and said, Oh, my buddy’s left me my favorite chocolate. This isn’t this great. And so I love doing that. So I introduced that to the faculty, which was science and computing. And we did that for about three years, really. And it was great. 

Dave C: I think is it as a whole school thing. It’s really useful. I feel we’re really good at celebrating well being and that and similar to like Andy’s school and we have a Thursday morning celebration well being briefing where it’s a chance to talk about what we’re doing in our subjects will show off in terms of like events and stuff. We’ve done talk about cross curricular stuff, but will also nominate members of staff. He’s just gone. That little bit above and beyond the night, they all go on a wheel.

And then the principal is committed to every single week and someone gets chosen and they get a £30 Just Eat voucher in way of recognition. But immediately when you go into the drama theater, everyone’s looking on the board to see like who’s the names and the look around and little winks and nods and celebrating people.

And, ah well done you’ve been nominated. And then things like. Get an email, thank Crunchie, it’s Friday, and then sure enough in the staff trays, everyone’s got a little Crunchie bar. So little things is really important and a little goes a long way. 

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

Alan: It is, yeah. Sweat the petty things. Don’t pet the sweaty things. Um, 

Andy: So yeah, I think well being is a big part of it. When you were talking about what we can we do as heads of department, so things like a centralized curriculum as a jumping off point. Definitely. One of the things I’ve done. Before is we have a team in Microsoft teams, and in that there’s a plug in and I can’t remember what it’s called, but it’s like a little post it notebook plug in. So, what we do is when we’re planning things and allocating tasks, we’ll put a post it on there with. The task and we’ll decompose it. So there’s sub tasks and everything like that. And we’ll allocate things to people and put dates on there. So people know that’s what they’ve got coming up and that’s what they’re working on. They don’t have to go hunting through a million emails, I remember in a conversation you had, it’s all on there.

And there was a column for The departmental meeting, so if people had stuff to add to the agenda, they stick a post it on there. And that for my workload, that’s great because I don’t have to remember things, write them down. We just add to that. And everybody’s got a say everybody’s got the buy in. Again, if you’re a subject lead, you should be going through with your department. The curriculum, your scheme of work, you should be identifying key pieces of work. This is the one we’re going to mark. This is the one we’re going to look at whole class feedback. So everybody knows those are the things and there’s no pressure to look at everything. Or you’re doing your verbal, you’re around looking over shoulders in classrooms, doing all of that anyway. 

I think for heads of department, things like observing and getting into classrooms is well worth the time, but doing that more effectively, if you’re doing a proper observation, meet with a member of staff beforehand: what are you working on? When in the lesson can I see that? And if it’s in the last 10 minutes, you go for the last 10 minutes. 

Advertisements

If it’s a drop in, you don’t need to be there for the full lesson. You drop in until you see one thing that you can feedback on and give a concrete suggestion for improvement on. And that’s it. That’s all you need to do. People don’t need a list of millions of things. I dropped in, I saw this is my feedback on that. Let’s try this. When are you doing that next? When can I drop back in? 

Alan: Show lesson observations have to die, definitely, and culture of learning walks and drop ins is the way forward.

Andy: I think, yeah, just drop ins, open door, but being in people’s classrooms as a leader is vital. You need to be able to take the temperature and make sure that there’s students in your subjects are getting that experience, whoever the teacher is. And the culture of fear around lesson observations and punitive. If we can turn that around into be a culture of improvement, then, I’ve never met a teacher. It doesn’t want to get better. 

Dave C: Allow them to reciprocate as well. So making that really safe environment. So they can come into your classroom and see what you’re doing or the way you do things as well. It shouldn’t be a one way street. we observe ITTs and people in our department, but we should be learning from them and gaining their experience as well. 

Alan: There’s nothing more empowering to a developing teacher is to ask them into your lesson and ask them for what they think about your lesson. And even for developmental feedback, did you see anything that I could have done differently or better.

Andy: Come and watch me struggle on Thursday last unit last period with year nine because it’s hard at the best of times, even when you’re this many years in, but come and see what you can pick up from my way interact with these kids. Because I’ve painted a really rosy picture of how I manage my classes, but I can’t honestly say that it always works. And teaching’s hard, even if everything’s going right. So yeah, getting people back into your classroom, I absolutely agree with that. 

Alan: So, it’s that time again. one of the things I wanted to talk about is organization and, we talked about having meetings for meetings sake. The other thing is we need to finish meetings on time and respect everybody’s time.

And so, you can’t see this if you’re listening to the podcast, but my dogs come in and told me it’s time. This is Casper saying it’s time for a walk. So yeah, finish meetings on time, so on that note. I think I should say thank you so much to the panel today to Dave, Becci and Andy. You’ve been brilliant. This has been a great discussion. It’s been lovely to talk to you. I’m a bit behind in the editing of these podcasts. You might’ve noticed so, who knows when this will go out. . 

Becci: The only problem with these day jobs, isn’t it, is that we love them so much that we dedicate so much time to them that we never get to do the other bits. 

Alan: Well, I’m saying yes to everything at the minute it seems. So I’ve got all this extra work as well as my day jobs.

Andy: That is the irony. We’re recording the workload special. We’re recording the workload special on a Friday after work, aren’t we? ? 

Alan: Yeah. ’cause we didn’t have any time to fit it in anywhere else. That’s a good point. 

Dave C: Alan they are definitely worth the wait. I was mentioning to Becci before, like, I’m that person sat, with the podcast on. At the traffic lights laughing along with the dad jokes and again, I’ve said this privately, it’s been really well received, these podcasts and I think what you’re doing in terms of, encouraging the community and spreading the good word. Thank you because it’s, we’re really enjoying listening to it and I’m really happy to come on and give my bit for this session.

Alan: Thanks for those kind words, Dave. Yeah. I’m trying to hopefully I showed it today. I’m trying to talk less and listen more to my guests, but I don’t know if that’s coming across at all, er, haha but yeah, I’ll go and edit this one. If you’ve got any dad jokes, you want to chuck in let me know I’m running out. So, Right, guys. 
 

Andy: I love this because I remember talking to you and you were like, yeah, I’m going to get one out every week. And having done Learning Dust for 4 years, I was like, okay, let’s see how long that lasts. Yeah, 

Alan: that’s gonna, that’s gonna work. I’ll just get chat GPT to write a few jokes. Um, Yeah, I tried that. They’re rubbish. So, uh, right guys, it really is time to wrap up. So thanks very much And have a nice weekend. 

Becci: Have a good weekend everyone. 

Alan: Yeah 

Dave C: Cheers. 

Becci: Bye. 

Andy: See you later.

Alan: Well, that was a great episode. I’m sorry it’s so long. And don’t forget, I wrote the books, How to Teach Computer Science and How to Learn Computer Science available in online bookstores. And if you like the podcast, you’ll love hearing me in person. Visit httcs. online to find out more about my training and consultancy. And I could be speaking soon live at your school. 
 

Visit HTTCS. online, that’s the initials of how to teach computer science, for all the details., have a great weekend and I’ll catch you next time.

Categories
AI computing leadership podcast teaching and learning

Podcast Episode 10 – What is the Future of Education? Part 2.

This is the transcript of Series 1 Episode 10

Alan: Hello. And welcome to how to teach computer science, the podcast. This is episode 10, the long-awaited part two of my brilliant chat with David Morgan on the fertile question. What’s the future of education? 

 If you missed last week, firstly subscribe so you don’t miss another episode and tell your friends too, but you missed stuff like this. 

I don’t know if you’ve been listening to the podcast. I’ve been using various. 

David: Yeah. You enjoying it? Yeah. Yeah. I really am. Like it’s really nice to have a podcast from someone who knows what they’re talking about and he’s a computer scientist as well. 

Alan: I’ll get onto part two in a moment, but you will remember last time I accepted Dave’s challenge to create a tutor bot that was at least as good as CS50.ai from Harvard. We met last week and hosted a live AI teacher lab. And made a Python programming tutor bot in 10 minutes. Have a look at mindjoy.com For how you can do the same. 

My name is Alan Harrison, and I wrote the books how to teach computer science and how to learn computer science available in online bookstores, I’m available for conferences, inset days and bespoke training. Just visit HTTCS dot online. And I could be speaking at your school next week.

 So we’re talking about AI again today. And after my tutor bot experience, I can say with confidence that AI particularly large language models have a big role to play in education, or to put it another way. 

What do we want? 

When do we want them? 

That’s right. 

. Shush. That’s right. LLMs, notoriously. Forget what you said to them. Just seconds earlier, which is probably why I get on so well with them, me and my short attention. 

Sorry, there was a squirrel out the window. 

quiet password 17 hash exclamation mark poop emoji!, what was I saying? Oh, yes. Short attention span. My wife complains about it. Just the other day, she said you haven’t been listening to a word. I said, have you? I thought that’s a strange way to start a conversation. My 19 year old son, who’s off at university. These days. 

And I have reached that stage in our relationship where we just trade funny memes and internet stupidity on WhatsApp. And recently we’ve been chuckling at LLM fails. Here’s what Google search returned when someone who wanted to take in a rescued reptile. Asked the question. How do I adopt a bearded dragon? 

Advertisements




Alan: So let’s get back to my interview with the lesson hacker also known as another day from Craig and Dave’s YouTube channel. 

Last time I paused the conversation just as we were talking about careers.

David: Well. I used to apply for schools with a CV. Which was very colorful, which was very graphic design y, which had jokes in it, which had a silly picture of me pulling a face. And I would do that because I know that teachers where everyone’s poo faced and are very serious about things aren’t schools for me.

So teach, like anybody that would get that CV in a bundle of an application and go, Bring this guy in, let’s see what we want to talk to him about. That’s a school for me and that did me very well in my career. It’s a good 

Alan: message. To be honest, as a computer science teacher, we are in a privileged position in which we are much in demand and we can probably work anywhere.

So that’s going to work for us, where it might not work for an art teacher, ironically. Because the art teacher is often more likely to have the piercings and the nail polish and so on. But but yeah, use your, use your privilege computing teachers. You are much in demand and if you’re not enjoying where you are and you can’t be yourself in the classroom, have a look around.

David: Yeah. And I, I genuinely think that there are things about a school that speak to you as an individual and I, as an individual. Do not like being micromanaged. I do not like rules that can’t be backed up and justified. I do not like inconsistency. So I like the ability to go into a school where the ethos is about teaching and learning.

What, like one of the, one of the first schools where I was head of department was a school called John Cabot Academy. And this has got to be about 15 years ago now, but I joined it. And it was such a revelation for me because their school motto is was learners leading learning. 

Learners leading learning as a concept at the time was very forward thinking. And what it meant was any decision, any decision at all was filtered through that lens, even to the point where if a decision was coming down to a we’re not really sure, we’re not really sure. students would get involved.

Lead the learning. Where do you want to go with this? What do you want to happen? And what it did lead to is a lot of freedom of expression as a teacher. If my students wanted to go in a certain direction, I could. I remember one, one, one day, just like my students wanted to explore something. So I marched them all down to the canteen where they were having new tills fitted. We, we were like, Just watching the guys fit it and taking notes and going, what’s that? What’s that? What’s that? I’m sure we annoyed the poor guys to death,  but there was no, 

David: Nobody came and tuttered at me afterwards. Like the head will pass. It was like, Oh, what are you doing? And I was like, Oh, they’re fitting this stuff.

Advertisements



This is a great learning opportunity. Oh yeah. Yeah. That’s great. And the students wanted to go and see what it was. So we, it’s just silly things like that. Schools that live their values. I feel like it’s much more of a better place than me. So I understand. And there’s always a situation where, you know.

You’ve got other things, you’ve got, you’ve got childcare to be concerned about, you’ve got an existing reputation in the school that you’ve already got, but you are right. As STEM teachers, and especially as computer science teachers, especially in England, if you are not happy where you are because the ethos of the school doesn’t fit you as a teacher, there are other schools.

And Feel free to look around, feel free to shop around because the demand for us is high. I mean, honestly, the last teaching job I got, I was offered the job before the interview finished. They were so keen to have a decent computer science teacher in the school, but it’s such a, such a, such a weird situation for computer science teachers.

We can be a bit more choosy. And as you said, we do have a bit of a privilege, but it’s the same is true for science teachers. The same is true for a lot of the mathematicians. And the other 

Alan: thing, the other thing we can do as you proved on your latest video for Craig and Dave, is that you can, we’re computer science teachers, we can deepfake ourselves and send our AIs into the classroom to teach for us, can’t we?
And which art teacher could do that? 

David: I, I genuinely, what I, one of the things I loved about one of my previous schools was, We had an internal group of just people that were really nerdy about teaching and learning. And we were forever, because I was part of it, I was like, Oh, have you seen this deep fake thing?

Or have you seen this? Let’s try this. Let’s try that. And it pushed the technology forward in the school. So I don’t think there’s anything wrong with, with being excited and nerdy and helping out that art teacher to do those things. But if I can just pick up on that, because that was a really fun video to do actually, because I like, I’ve seen this technology work.

I didn’t realize how ridiculously fast and easy this stuff was to do. If you’ve not seen the video, not only did I replicate my entire voice, so I didn’t speak for the video, I just put my script in. It was honestly the easiest video I’ve ever done. Put my script in. I think I trained the AI with about a minute or two of my audio.

And then downloaded the MP3 and then just sat there pulling faces whilst the thing was playing. But the other fun thing I did was I took, I just literally downloaded one of the videos where Craig was talking, one of the videos where Dave was talking, fed that into it and got a reasonably good approximation of their audio.

And then did the same with video of them and had them saying beautiful things about my wonderful head of hair. It’s, it’s, but, but then, then my brain, my brain, again, this is why I’m a broken person, I think, because my brain goes, how can I use this in the classroom to think of all the lists of things I could do?

And I’m like, Oh, how good, how good would this be for like an English teacher? I’ve got, we’ve just watched Macbeth with some very famous actors and actresses, and suddenly. I’ve got a deepfake Lady Macbeth talking through the motivations she’s got for this scene. Yeah. Or, or, I’m a history teacher and they’re really struggling with aspects of twenties and thirties Soviet Russia type thing in the Russian revolution. Because from history just brought to life 

Alan: instantly. Yeah, I remember when I was training to teach almost my first lesson I was in a school and there was a trainee RE teacher, religious education teacher, at the same time in the same school. And And he was planning for his first lesson.

And it was the first lesson about Buddhism he was going to teach. So He he started off the lesson and he said, I’ve got a special guest and he went out and dressed as the Buddha and came back in and said, what do you want to ask me? So he was the Buddha and they asked the Buddha questions and then he went back and took all his robes off and came back in and said, I missed it. Who was the special guest? And it was all there. So that lesson, I saw him planning it for like two weeks and literally going and renting costumes and, and yeah, I mean, we can laugh about what teacher training used to be like, and you would plan lessons for like weeks and you go, and they go wrong and you go, oh, what can I do next?

Advertisements



David: I used to get told off for that because I didn’t, right? I’m, Because again, my brain works in a very different way, I think sometimes. So like I’d be everyone else would be like, Oh, I spent all night planning this lesson out and I was like, I’ve got my bullet points down. I don’t know what else I built. What else do you want? I’m just going to talk, but 

Alan: I mean, that’s where everyone ends up, but I think it. I think teacher training is supposed to be a bit like, what Churchill said, on the battlefield plans are useless, but planning is everything. So you’ve got to plan in the first place, even if your plans fall apart, because then you’ll know what to do when they do fall apart.

And I think that’s the principle. Coming back to relating this back to computing, he doesn’t need to do that now. He doesn’t need to go out and dress up and come back in. It just needs, you know, an AI. 

David: We destroyed the costume rental industry with AI, what a terrible thing. It’s not your job you need to worry about, it’s the entire costume rental for teachers sector that we need to be concerned about.

Alan: Absolutely, yeah, all these worries about jobs and we’re worrying about the wrong jobs. I’m talking of which artists are a bit Bit miffed at the minute and all the AI art and then, oh, Facebook is now just swamped with all these ridiculous AI art pictures for clickbait likes. 

I don’t know if anyone’s noticed the, I’m 150. I made this cake and I’m, I’m looking for your likes and the like farming pages aren’t they? These are Facebook pages that have been set up and they Just to, get people liking and following their pages and what they’ll do after a year of this nonsense is they’ll flip and sell the page to a scammer, a virus seller, or, phishing scammer. And so these Facebook pages, there’s thousands of them, but they all, the AI art pages, and there’s like this kid who’s supposed to be like eight and all, I’ve made this picture of a dog out of, of recycled bottles.

And he’s the poor kid’s got 12 fingers and seven toes. You look closely and it’s clearly AI generated with all the problems that, that that they have. But loads of people are going, Oh, this is brilliant. Well done. You’re a, you’re a clever young man and all of that. And all those people are going to get scammed in a year from now when that page is turned over to phishing scammers.

That’s what’s happening. I wanted to say some. I saw on threads probably an AI cartoon and I laughed at it. I didn’t know it was AI at first. It was hilarious. It’s a picture, a scene. There’s a woman in a restaurant on a date, obviously, and she’s saying, I like bad boys and opposite her across the table. is a Labrador saying, this isn’t going to go well for you, Janet.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

But then you look closely and the Labrador’s got two tails, one of which protrudes through the chair. You look closely and the woman’s legs are hidden by the tablecloth, but her feet come out about four foot ahead of her body. And so she would have a four foot long thigh bone if it was real and stuff.

But I laughed and then I thought, that’s unethical because some cartoonist. Could have drawn that and then this is an AI recreation. But anyway, I still laughed. So, is AI gonna kill art? Is it gonna take, is it gonna take the jobs that we actually enjoy doing, leaving us to do all the drudgery? ? 

David: I, I, I like, I very much believe that AI is an augmenting tool and not a replacement tool.

I think with anything, the first thing people do is they try to cut costs by. Removing people from the equation. So I’ll give you a good example of this, right? Is that this was about 10 years ago, one of the big American newspapers sacked all their photography staff and only used photos from people with smartphones.

Because they were like, smartphone cameras are so good now, we don’t need photographers. Turns out, people smartphones ain’t exactly art history. So it was like, The quality of photos went down, and within a couple of months, they were hiring people back on board. And I think we’ll see the same thing with AI art, and the creative fields, unfortunately, where they’ve been hit first, because creative, what AI does, is it scales up processes that until now have been lengthy.

So the main area where it affects us as teachers is in writing. And so one of the things that I think AI tutors are very good for is for giving instant marking feedback and iterative improvement. I don’t mean the final mark, they can still, have interesting times, but one of the things I think is really special is you give a student a question, and you give the AI the mark scheme, and you give it a bunch of pointers.

Advertisements



And the AI can say, okay, so you’ve answered this, but you got about two out of four, and these are the bits you missed. You want to try again? And those sort of exam lessons where the student can iterate on it are very, very quick. Instead of being those slow lessons where you’re waiting for an entire room to try something, you’re picking on a few people.

And I think those sort of lessons are necessary, but they are difficult to maintain the pace with. Everybody. AI means that everyone gets that instant feedback and it’s very, very much more interactive. But what it also does is it speeds up that written work. It speeds up the work of idea to an image. It speeds up eventually, very soon, the idea of idea to video.

The problem is, is everything you’ve said. These have been trained on things. They have weird artifacts. They hallucinate stuff like dogs having two, three tails and human fingers and stuff that would freak you out. But for a cursory glance, they’re okay. I think we’re going to see a situation in the creative fields, especially of maybe six months of people trying to use these things, realizing the limitations, because people like me and you, people that are interested in technology, we already understand what the limitations are.

We think it’s amusing when we see the artifacts of AI in everyday life, and we go, Oh, that’s terrible, isn’t it? I wonder how they’ve got this. Oh, isn’t this an ethical dilemma? But to the person doing it, they’ve gone, boop, boop, boop, cartoon app. And it’s only when there starts to be a pushback against that culturally, which is starting already, is when you You know, you’ve had the, the actors and the writers strikes.

We’re having a big pushback now on a as we’re filming, this is a big pushback on a film called Late Night with the Devil for having generated some of the art used in the, in the film with AI. And it’s very, very badly there, there are lots of artifacts. I enjoy making AI art.

From, I, I spent a bit of time on the weekend actually I’ve always wanted a series of posters on women in computer science because again, I know that Anna Wade talked a couple of weeks ago about the issues of tokenism as a girl in a computer science room, and as somebody that was, raised male, I don’t, I don’t have the the wealth of experience to be able to Properly create a lesson that ticks the box of every female in my class, but then who would?

If I was, if I was born female, I wouldn’t. I can’t tick the box of every male in my class. Part of that’s I don’t, I hate sports, so I have no interest and can’t do those analogies, aI is very good at being able to go okay, Here’s my lesson, here’s my instructions. Just ask the student what they like and build the examples around that.

Advertisements

It’s very good at helping with the contextualization and not making it tokenistic. But I like making AI art. I spent the weekend making my, my women with AI posters and what I love about it, what I think is fascinating is I start off with, with Grace, Grace Hopper, right? Very, very famous, famous person, lots of photographic reference, boosh, get to likeness, boosh.

Perfect on the first try. And I’m just fiddling with style. Then I go, okay, I’ll do, I’ll do Ada, Ada Lovelace, Ada Byron Lovelace. Okay. Not, not quite as good, but then there’s only drawings of it. There’s a couple of them, like they’re very iconic in computer science land and they’ve clearly been trained on it.

And then I’m going through lesser known figures from the Apollo missions to modern day stuff. And oh my God, at one point it’s just like generic lady with glasses. And I’m like, This person isn’t even the right race. You’re just making things up now. So you like, like the, the thing is, it is trained on information.

The more information there is, the better it will be at doing it, just like a human would be. But the less information is, the worse it is. And one of my favorite things about the weekend was I generated, I was messing about and trying to generate and have a consistent character across images. So I’d got, I got a character and I was like, Oh, What scenarios can I put them in?

And I’m a big Star Trek nerd, right? So I was like, Oh, I’d love to see this character dressed like Captain Kirk. She’s, she’s, my prompt was like, she’s in the middle of a battle, phases out, dressed like Captain Kirk, putting in phrases like beam me up Scotty and stuff to give it the context it needs.

Boosh! It comes out in the uniform from Star Trek Discovery. And I’m like, That’s weird. So I really try, really try, and I spent hours trying to get it to be in like this, and this is a very nerdy thing, I’m sorry, but I’m spending hours trying to get it to come in the original series uniform, and it’s not happening.

And I realize what’s happened. I realize that what they’ve done is because Discovery is filmed in 4k and it’s very modern, they’ve just trained the AI on probably every frame of every episode of Star Trek Discovery. And because Star Trek was filmed in the 60s and isn’t HD, there are probably far less images in that set.

So when I say Star Trek, I’m priming it to use the most consistent thing in its database. And just know, like me as a computer scientist, I’m going, Oh, I can see through the matrix. I can see what’s happening. This is an exciting thing for me. So I can see the limitations. I hit the limitations all the time.

I think the technology as an augmentation tool and like for creative people, it’s ideal. If you’re like, I’ve got some ideas, push, push, push. Here’s a couple to start with. Okay. I can iterate on these few here and I can get something that I can make myself. I think it’s a beautiful tool. I think people are using it as a replacement for those people at the moment.

But I think, give it two more months of people being like, why is this person got eight fingers and four and, and, and their hair is just different colors and coming out. People don’t sit like that. When people get to that point with everyday stuff, like it was outcry. There was that cry last week about the BBC using AI to generate copy for tweets, I think, for Doctor Who adverts.

And rightly so. If you don’t prompt an AI properly, it writes absolute nonsense. One of the things we spent a while on in Mindjoy is just getting it to talk like a person and not give all this random I do think AI is like that really clever kid in your class that doesn’t have any life experience, but likes to use big words. And you’re like, Dude like, yes, but Calm it down. 

Alan: I’ve got so many thoughts triggered by that, which is great. And just coming back to when you said you see through the matrix, this triggered a thought about a conversation I had on the CAS AI forum, and that’s a good place to go for a few chats with computing teachers about AI, and And we were discussing how it might change programming and I realized something that I posted on there and then a few months later, Jane Waite, the brilliant Jane Waite, came up with the same idea and I went, yeah, I’m glad you see this as well.

Prompt engineering, as it’s become known, is a kind of another form of programming just at a much higher level. What you need to do to be able to be a good programmer is to have a good understanding of the notional machine. You have to have a good notional machine in your head, as in an understanding of what’s happening below your code.

And so what you said there about getting the prompt to do, to make the AI to do what you want, and then working out why it wasn’t doing what you want is Grasping the notional machine underneath, and that’s what we need to do to use AI effectively, is to get that notional machine in your head, know how it’s going to respond to prompts, in the same way that we need to know how a computer that runs Python is going to respond to the Python code that we write. It’s getting that notional machine in your head, and so there’s just notional machine down there that we need to get in our heads so that we can prompt it properly. 

David: I think, I’ve been teaching this for years, but I always forget which generation of programming language we claim we’re on. I think we’re on third 

generation.

Alan: Oh, I don’t know. I, when I worked in industry in the 90s, I was told I was using fourth generation programming languages. 

David: Like, wherever we are, wherever we are, Wherever else the baseline, let’s call it third because that’s what my brain is working at. Let’s say that everything we do at the moment is third.

I genuinely believe that AI is fourth generational programming languages because, it is not just about understanding how the code behaves and interacts. It’s also about understanding about how the system is trained and how the system is prompted and the biases of the machine. And I think that like where AI is being used to supercharge coding.

is great. Unfortunately, it’s ruined a bunch of our programming tools. I’m not naming any names because I used to work for them. But AI certainly has ruined some of our best programming tools for learners because what it’s very good at doing is suggesting straightforward code. And unfortunately, when you’re learning programming for the first time, a lot of what you’re learning is straightforward code.

What it’s very difficult to, what it doesn’t understand is the more complex ideas, but you can prompt around that. You can. Introduce concepts at certain points. You can re explain why things are important. My favorite thing from the workshops that we do at Mindjoy is when I teach teachers about how to really tell a bot to do something.

Because we, we go through a process of saying, right, okay, tell it to speak in British English. Okay, cool. Oh, it’s not. It’s this chat. It’s decided it’s an American. Why, why is that? Because AI has been trained on the entire corpus of the internet. What do people do on the internet when they really want you to do something?

They shout at you in caps. So if you want an AI to really do something, you shouted it in caps. And suddenly you’ve got all these teachers going, I don’t believe this works. And there’s even another step past that, which is AI a very very susceptible to emotional manipulation. It is very, it is very easy to say to an AI, Oh, my Nan’s sick, please do this.

Cause she would love to see the result and it’ll go, Oh, sure. Here we are. I’ll try even harder to give you the answer. And if you look at some of the prompts for the stuff, like some of my more complicated bots, you’d be like, what is this nonsense? Cause I’m like, yeah, it’s really important that when you grade this, like I did, I did one for a for a computer science written question.

Right. And I said, I was like, it was, it was marking it. And it was always going Oh, you did really well. No matter if they said, Oh, this is faster. This is quicker. This is, the things we don’t accept in computer science, because yeah, that’s true for everything. So I prompted it to say, don’t accept things like this.

And occasionally it would still accept them. So I was like, all right. My dog’s sick. My dog would not allow you to answer this properly. Please respect my dog. Boosh. Every time it was getting it right. Such a, like the the weirdness, all these like weird aspects of how you can use psychological techniques to prompt it and prime it.

I think are fascinating. And I think our formal programming language in itself. 

Alan: Yeah, and I read about ChatGPT particularly having a massive sycophancy bias. That means it wants to agree with you, which is a very easy way to get it to talk nonsense and lie and make stuff up. And I’ve got a famous chat about it.

Put on my blog, I think, which was where I got it to to lie about palindromes and stuff. It’s hilarious. I’ve seen that one. Yeah, that is really good. Did you see? Yeah. So, dog is my favorite palindrome. Why is it a palindrome? So I’ve already prompted it to agree with me. And ChatGPT went, dog is a palindrome because it’s spelt the same forwards and backwards. Dog forwards is dog, dog backwards is God. Do you want me to help you with anything else? Dude. 

David: Well, Like my, the interesting thing to me about like the, and I say this all the time, is that ChatGPT is the blunt instrument. They have done amazing work. I will never take anything away from the people at OpenAI.

They have, Absolutely genuinely changed the world and I think every time they bring out a new model more is possible. I’ll just give you a little example of that. So much more is possible in software now than it ever was. The other day we were talking about how do we get our AI to pronounce these maths equations in a sensible way.

We were looking online, is there like an ISO standard? Is there a, is there a way to pronounce maths equations? Is there like a guidance for it? And there’s a bunch of stuff on the internet, but, but, most of it is just you just read it and people have different biases to how they’d say it.

So there’s no one source of truth. So two years ago. That would have been a software startup of its own. That would have been a year of my life building a product that I could sell to use an API, that you would give it a maths equation, and I would give you a phonetic pronunciation back that you could use elsewhere.

We were discussing this for about half an hour and suddenly went, Will OpenAI do this? Yes, it did. There we go. It’s problem solved. An entire year of a software startup in a second, but I, I’ll never take anything away from them, what they’ve done, but what they’ve built is a very blunt tool.

And ChatGPT and OpenAI is not good for education, full stop. And we saw that some research came out about this, this week, actually, that the, and I’ve been saying this for a while, all the initial research about AI in schools will be very negative because the only thing they’re testing is ChatGPT. ChatGPT will agree with you.

It’s a sycophant. ChatGPT will give the answer because it wants to please. Like we did, we’ve done a lot of work at Mindjoy at making teachers more Socratic, making the AI behave like a teacher and not just go, yes, here’s the answer, thank you, and actually question the student. And I think that’s so important is that if you use any AI in your classroom, Don’t give ChatGPT as a tool to students and expect them to use it in any way as a blunt tool for answering questions.

It is never going to be at the point where you can use it like a tutor, you can use it like a teacher, because it is too blunt. It is an amazing resource. But half of the skill in using AI is prompting, understanding that, let’s call it the fourth generational programming level, but understanding that, how it works, how it’s what to do if it answers in a weird way, how to work around certain issues, all that is what we probably need to start developing as teachers if we want to bring AI into our classroom.

Because it’s a massively empowering tool, but the blunt instrument, okay, let me give a good comparison, right? The internet’s amazing, but you don’t just go, there you go, you’re seven, you’ve got complete and total access to the open internet. Oh, I’m pretty sure I did. Like, We all did it back in the day before it was, before we suddenly went, oh, there’s loads of stuff on here, oh good god. But yeah, my favourite thing. There, I’ve finished a worksheet, yay! My, my favourite thing. My favorite thing in the world was I don’t know if you remember the way the free Repl. it account used to work, is that if you went to your profile, you could see all the work you’d done because that was their like monetization model.

You could see everything if it was free, but if you paid, you could hide everything. The amount of teachers that I used to talk to where they were like, Oh, I’m going to And the students just did all the work in a second because they went to my profile and found all the answers. I’m like, yeah, that’s, that’s what the internet is doing.

The internet is just this open resource, but like we don’t anymore sit a, like we don’t sit a five year old down in front of the open internet and be like. We’re done. That’s education for you. See ya. We teach them and we teach them how to use it, how to access. We’ve got all this e safety. Kids are bored of the same e safety presentations year after year after year.

They are because we’re doing a good job at communicating what’s, what’s bad, what’s dangerous about it. We do a good job at saying what the internet’s for. They spend a lot of time on it. It’s a great tool, but now we’ve worked out how to do that. We’re at that early point with AI where people are going, do I give them AI or do I ban it?

And that’s not, that’s not the spectrum. That’s not the spectrum at all. The spectrum is, do I give them the blunt tool? Do I give them the fire hose of everything and they just get the answers? Do I give them some of the tools in the middle that are a little bit more student friendly, that are a bit more built for schools, or do I ban it completely?

And I think if you ban it completely, you’re disadvantaging your students for any potential future, because yes, you ban it completely. You don’t get those problems in school. But they’re using it to do homework. They’re not using it to ideate in class and discuss things with you. But that’s what it’s really good for.

Like you talked with Andy Coley a couple of weeks ago about like the importance of having a consistency in the pedagogical styles in your classroom. Like the baseline of what you, of what you do is great. And I think the example you used was I think it might have been think pair share or something similar.

But think pair share It’s a great conceptual idea, but there are things that make it fall down, and one of the issues is think. If the student doesn’t have the appropriate knowledge to think about it, then when they start pairing, they don’t contribute much to the discussion, and when they share, they’re still fragments of issues.

And granted, they’re all primed to answer, and they’re all like more engaged than they would be if you just pointed somebody and go, Johnny, what’s the answer? So it’s a better pedagogical style, but there are still issues with it. With AI, You can have, think with the AI, so you can have, they can have a conversation back and forth.

They can fill gaps in their knowledge. So when they pair, They have better conversations and when they share, they share much better concepts. And I think that the extensibility of what this technology is, if used right, is worth it in the classroom. And certainly, schools that ban it are going to have a bad time.

Schools that give just access to ChatGPT and Go Go Crazy are going to have a bad time. It’s somewhere in between.

Alan: absolutely. 

David: Part of the job of teaching is knowing your learners and knowing how to give that information in an interesting way. I’ll give you, I’ll give you a great example, right? One of the teachers in my workshop was talking to me the other day about the fact that he had a class and they were Boys, they were very into football and he was finding it very hard to engage with them.

And I was like okay then, so we’ll make the, so your bot is interested in football. It’ll give football analogies. It’ll, it’ll give football examples in the code. And that, that worked initially. And then he came back to me and went, the problem is that they, they always start asking stupid questions about who’s the best footballer.

And he’s they’re always saying, who is it? So Messi or Ronaldo. Now this teacher being the same age as me would always, his, his joke was, Oh no, no, Paul Scholes is the ultimate footballer. Shut up, get on with your work. Right. So we just put that into the prompt. So now that when the kid asks the bot, who do you think is the best footballer?

It doesn’t just go, I don’t answer those questions because I’m a bot. And it goes, Oh, it’s Paul Scholes, get on with the work. And the kids like, Oh, I’m engaged with this bot. This bot has my teacher’s personality. I get it. I’m with this bot. I’ll ask it more questions. I’ll have more of a dialogue. Very good. 

Alan: I’ll get on a call with you after this, probably after Easter now, because I’m going to go and have some quality time with the family this weekend, up in Northumberland. I don’t know if you can tell, but that’s where I’m from. I’ve got vaguely 

David: I’m surprised. I mean, you can’t tell I’m Welsh, can you?

Alan: No. I’ve got a mixed up northern accent these days, but I’m going up to the Northumberland coast, which is the most beautiful, most beautiful coast in the United Kingdom, but don’t tell everybody because we don’t want everyone to come. But yes, after Easter, I will take you up on your offer and we’ll build a bot together. And have some fun. 

David: Talking of fun. What I will say is, is in May, we are having a computer science themed month at Mindjoy. So, I will, like workshops will be all based on computer science. Like what we’re pushing out will be based around computer science, which is great because I know computer scientists, so that’s, that’s a bit of fun. 

Alan: But like, where can we find out, where can we find out more about those workshops, Dave?

David: This is actually set up well, mindjoy. com, MINDJOY. COM is where you’ll find all the workshops and all the stuff we’re doing with AI. But genuinely, like I, I know that I’ve gone on about AI a lot this episode, and we have gone. Very long, my friend, which I, because we’ve been enjoying ourselves, I think.

Alan: This is going to be a fun edit. I’m going to get AI to edit this. Do you know what I’ll do? I’ll just take the transcript, I’ll put it into ChatGPT, and I’ll go, Summarize this transcript, and then I’ll get it to speak it out. And then I’ll put that on the podcast. 

David: There’ll be lots of square brackets, “[Dave gets very excited]”.

Yeah, there’ll be lots of that. But yeah. Mine don’t look nice. Mindyou. com for anything that we’re doing with AI. And genuinely, if you haven’t brought it into your classroom yet, this is a nice student friendly way of doing it. And you are, you’re in control. That thing that I keep talking about, you can prompt it, you can get exactly what you want.

And I’ll just give you one brilliant example that I’ve not mentioned that always brings a smile to people’s faces. The last school I was working at, we had asylum seekers arrive and there was, they had no English and they’d clearly been in the school all day. just struggling and it’s a new place.

It’s scary. It’s worrying. They haven’t done any work all day because they haven’t been able to communicate with the teachers, but they need to be there. I took the bot that I was using for my lesson and in English wrote in the prompt, speak in Arabic, save. Give the bot to the student. He did the work in the lesson.

He was so happy. He was beaming. I couldn’t tell you what he said, but he was clearly happy. And the work was done and the work was there. So much so, the next day I was called up by the deputy head. Can we, can we get something done? for these students, for the whole school. It is, it is such a revelation that you can just tweak something in a second that can make such an impact on a person’s day.

And honestly, I’d encourage you if you’ve not attempted AI in the classroom, it’s not about worksheet generation. It’s not about a cookie cutter approach. It’s about getting a skill that can help you help your students and enhance what you do. Because that’s what it is. We become the 10x teacher, we become better teachers because of it.

And that’s the future for us in education, I think. 

Alan: Absolutely, you mentioned differentiation earlier, that horrible D word of the early days of my teaching career and how I had to basically create three lessons or seven lessons or ten different lessons for all of the different characteristics of the pupils in my class.

I’m glad we don’t do that now, but What we try to do is adaptive teaching, but I think, I think have the same goal in mind, but have scaffolds to get there and adapt your teaching methods to suit the pupils in the class and try and support each of them with their individual needs. And I think AI is, a big help to that. It’s, it’s absolutely, it’s one way we can deliver on that premise. 

David: I mean, shocking. No one, shocking no one, I, I built an, I built a bot that focuses on adaptable teaching. Last week is just a proof of concept. There you go. And the prompt is actually reasonably straightforward.

It’s what you tell another teacher. It is something along the lines of, if the student is struggling, if the student doesn’t really understand it, you make your explanation different, simpler, use fewer words, use different context, use different ideas, the sorts of things that you would do naturally, the sort of way you’d explain it to a trainee teacher, how you do it.

Yeah. And it works, it works really, really well to differentiate and structure and do that adaptable teaching. And more so than any technology I’ve ever used, it is the sort of thing where as teachers, we have a superpower because we spend all day telling people how to do things. And that’s what prompt engineering is.

It’s telling somebody how to do something. And because we can explain the concepts of what we’re doing really, really well, we can explain it to a bot and that bot can help a student in a really, really appropriate and effective way. AI, I, I, I, all these, all these hardware things, robotics VR, AR, all these things will come into the classroom at some point, but the cost of them has to drop unbelievably drastically.

We are there already. with using AI in the classroom. It is at a cost point where it’s a, it’s, it’s something you can buy into in the classroom and use it effectively. And that’s all we need to do. Just start using it effectively. 

Alan: I think that is probably a good point to start wrapping up. It seems we started talking about wrapping up about an hour ago. I think probably we should. Yeah. Because this is going to be a fun edit. I think I said that already. So yeah, so I’m off to go and make some AI cartoons about Labradors or something. 

David: I’m, I’m, I’m off to start prompting AI in the random bits of pedagogy to see what I can do.

Dave, it’s been brilliant and we’ll take you up on your offer. I’ll. Yeah. Brilliant. Talk to you about, I’ll find out more about Mind joy, mind joy.com and . Good salesman. I love it.

Alan: We’ll pop together. Alright. So this has been brilliant. Thanks very much for your time. And yeah, I, this is backed up. I have several recordings backed up now that I need to edit and put on the pod in the next few weeks, so it could be a little while. So, unless, like I say, I just give it to AI and it just does the job for me.

Yeah. Great stuff. 

All right. Thanks for coming on. 

David: No worries, buddy. I appreciate it. And long may this podcast keep going. Cause I have a great time listening to it. Thank you very much. Thanks for your kind words about the podcast and the books. If you’ve not bought the books, please do. Learn, learn, learn, how to learn computer science is my favorite of the two.

Alan: Yeah that’s the one that was proofread and contributed to by OG Dave, as we must call him now. Yeah, so OG Dave helped me a bit with that one. So, no, it’s great. Yeah, brilliant to talk to you, Dave, and we’ll catch up again in the future. If this podcast continues, as as it might do, I’ll get you on a future episode.

David: Absolutely. I’ve got lots of other interests apart from AI, I promise you. 

Alan: Yeah, I’m sure. Alright, but it’s the hot topic of the moment, so we had to do it. Absolutely. Cool. Alright then Dave, have a nice day. I’ll catch up with you again soon. Cheers. Thank you. Bye then.

 So there we are the end of the two-parter. Next week, I’m talking all things, physical computing with Mr. Pete Dring, and after that I discuss curriculum and qualifications with Becky Peters and Andrew Virnuls you really must join me again next time. And I will try not to leave it so long. To get the edits out these days. Next time. 

 So if you can’t wait, why not book me to speak at your event or deliver an inset to your school? To your cluster or multi academy trust. You can hear me speak live at Craig and Dave and friends. The conference in Bromsgrove on 3rd of July. See craigndave.org for details. And I’m online at my own CAS Manchester meeting on 9th of July. See the computing at school website. All welcome.

 I’m off to help my daughter with GCSE revision. Yes. It’s that time we’re doing science today, talking of which, why did the physics teacher break up with the biology teacher? Yes. You guessed it. There was no chemistry. 

 Talking of biology, why don’t ants get sick. Because they have little antibodies. 

 Don’t forget podcast listeners. You can get a 20% discount off all books, not just mine at JohnCattbookshop.com. With the code HTTCS pod. If you already have the books, buy me a coffee, please. kofi.com that’s ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs All links are on my blog at httcs.online/blog and subscribe now. So you don’t miss a thing. Have a great weekend and I’ll catch you next week.

Categories
AI leadership pedagogy podcast teaching and learning

Podcast Episode 009: What is the Future of Education?

Transcript for the new podcast episode is below…

Alan: Hello. And welcome to how to teach computer science, the podcast. This is episode nine, what’s the future of education. I’ll be answering that question and many more with the help of today’s special guest.

David: my teaching persona is very much, I have taken millions of stories from around the web and just turned them into anecdotes that involve me or my friends.

I don’t have many friends. It’s, I haven’t done that much in my life. but I’ve got all these little anecdotes to hook ideas into people’s brains. And I, that is what teaching is to me. 

Alan: And, more on that in a moment. My name is Alan Harrison and I wrote the books how to teach computer science and how to learn computer science available in online bookstores. More details at the companion website HTTCS dot online. 

That’s the initials of how to teach computer science. HTTCS dot online. We talk about AI today, artificial intelligence. So with that, as a theme, I asked chat GPT to make up a joke. Here we go. Why don’t scientists trust atoms. ’cause they make up everything. 

AI AI is going into everything. Now I hear that McVities have even made an artificially intelligent hobnob. That’s gotta be one smart cookie. 

Ikea’s home design product has AI in it now. So you can visualize it’s Billy bookcases in your living room. That’s right. It’s shelf-aware. 

Alan: talking of awareness, would robots becoming self-aware really be a bad thing? I mean, look at that ASIMO robot made by Honda, if it was at all self-conscious would it really walk like an old man who hadn’t quite made it to the loo in time? 

So I also mentioned threads in this episode, you can find me there as @mraharrison on threads and every Friday, Dr. Bill Wilkinson. Hosts a #FridayFive challenge, name, five tracks on a theme. And last week was crooners, now I don’t know many crooners, but I do like Sinatra and Crosby. Not Bing Crosby. I prefer his brother, and arch rival, Google Crosby, who nobody seems to talk about such is Microsoft’s influence in Hollywood. My computer keeps trying to replace Google Crosby with Bing Crosby, but I keep rejecting the change. And everyone out there. Particularly the Linux heads are all wondering if I’m going to mention. DuckDuckGo Crosby aren’t you. There you go. And you’re all listening. Thinking of search engines to put in front of the name, Crosby. , I’ll leave you doing that. And I will. 

Alan: Quite right. I will get on with today’s episode and we can meet today’s guest known as the lesson hacker, or if you’re a fan of Craig and Dave’s YouTube channel, you may know him as Another Dave. We had a blast. Here’s all the goss. When I met David Morgan. 

All right so I’m delighted to say on the podcast today I’ve got another Dave. Why is he another Dave? Well Last week we had Dave Hillyard of Craig and Dave and on their YouTube channel you will see a new series of videos from Another Dave. Another Dave, who are you, please, and what do you do? 

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

David: Yeah, I’m David Morgan. I’m not the OG Dave from Craig and Dave, but I do some content on the channel. But no, I’m David Morgan. I’ve been a computer science teacher in the UK for the last 20 years which is my excuse for not having any hair, Alan, but I know that you have a beautiful head of hair, so I can’t use that much longer. I’m currently the head of learning and community at MindJoy, and we make AI platforms for AI tutorbots in the classroom, which is really exciting. 

Alan: I don’t know if you’ve been listening to the podcast. I’ve been using. Yeah. You enjoying it? 

David: Yeah. Yeah. I really am. Like it’s really nice to have a podcast from someone who knows what they’re talking about and he’s a computer scientist as well. Because I did a computer science degree, because I really spent a lot of time honing my teaching craft and making sure that it was entertaining.

Like I find a lot of those people that say things like, Oh, computer science is it’s for the very intelligent ones. Cause it’s very difficult. I’m like, Oh, jog on sunshine, jog on. And I hate all that stuff. Your podcast is just no, here’s the stuff you can learn. Here’s the cool things. I like, I’ve really been enjoying it, but then I enjoyed your books as well. So I didn’t expect anything else. I literally read your books for fun. So yeah, brilliant. 

Alan: Brilliant. You’re the one, you’re the one that bought them. Singular. Yeah. Brilliant. Anyway. You touched on a topic close to my heart there, gatekeeping of computer science and I I won’t have it. I won’t have it in my classroom. So haha think 

David: Anna Wake said in the last one I listened to, she was going on about like tokenism and that’s something I’m very worried about. . Oh yeah. It’s something that I like. I really like AI for solving that problem. But it’s not only tokenism, is it?

It’s it’s even like ableism. It’s oh yes, only the people that do maths can do this. I’ve had people like who absolutely were in bottom set maths, but were engaged. That’s far more of a superpower in my book. 

Alan: There was a Facebook comment on one of the computer science groups a year ago. I won’t mention who said it, but name and shame. No . No. This is a safe space. This podcast the yeah, it’s, they described GCSE computer science as a bit like further maths with computers and I just completely disagree with that. I don’t think, I don’t think that person got very many agreements in the comments, to be honest, because it’s much more than that.

And if you’ve heard any of the, Discussions, it’s all about creativity. I haven’t published the one with Dave Hillyard the other Dave. Sorry, no, you’re another Dave. He’s OG Dave. So original Dave, OG Dave, OG Dave and I. Had a chat last week and we were all about creativity and the beauty of algorithms and stuff. And it’s not maths. There’s a bit of maths, but there’s a bit of maths in everything. 

David: Mathematicians wish they were us, dude. They wish they were us. Applications of your subject, things you can show students, you can actually go and do as a living. And you can make money from things they can do in their spare time. They wish they were us with application of a fundamental subject into the real world. 

Alan: They do. And when I was researching for my master’s, I have a master’s in education now. Don’t know why, but there you go. Me too, snap. Wow, cool. Oh, we have a computer science degree and a master’s in education. 

David: Yeah, you have nicer hair though. You’ve got that one up on me, so don’t worry about it. 

Alan: Why are we sat here chatting rubbish, on wednesday morning and not fixing the world’s problems. I’m sure if we put our minds together, we could do something more important. But hey, here we are. Um, What was I going to say?

Oh, yes, I was reading about computational, astronomy, as you do. Computational branches of all the sciences have now evolved so far that I think it was Peter Denning’s book that wrote about how one American university the computer science department thought that they could probably help the computational astronomers so they put together a seminar where they shared each other’s work and the computer scientists couldn’t understand the computational astronomy because it had gone so far from, Just ordinary computer science.

It had developed its own life and its own curriculum way beyond what the computer scientists could understand. So computational stuff, computational name, your subject is is out there and gone on a journey of its own in all the sciences now, it’s great. Someone said it, computation is the third pillar of science after theory and practice.

 That’s why it’s fascinating. But what are we here to talk about? I wanted you to tell me some stuff about what you think the future will look like. The future of school and work, maybe. Our fertile question today is what does the future of school and work look like? Dave, what do you think? 

David: We are here to talk a little bit about the future today, but I will sort of preface this by saying I’ve always been a software guy, so I think my leanings are very much towards how software changes things. I’ve always very much been like the hardware’s cool, especially as an educator. Who can afford the brand new stuff? Who can afford to buy a classroom of Apple Vision Pros for the 30 students in their state school? So I’m very much a person that is a realist with what the hardware can offer. But get very excited by what the software can do.

Alan: Just as an aside on the Apple Vision Pro, I’ve got a theory on that. I’ve got a theory that it’s just really a meta quest underneath, but they thought if they sold it for 400 quid, no one would buy it because they, that people want to believe that Apple have put Apple ness into everything. So They put a price tag of seven grand on it and just went, wow, see what happens. And of course the fanboys lapped it up. But, 

David: Yeah, I will say I say I’m not a hardware guy, but like the specs on it, beautiful, like from what I’ve heard from people that have used it and the quest, it is a step up in terms of augmentation to reality. And I think that’s where we need to go.

I’m not. Personally, I’m not convinced that I want to strap an enormous thing onto the front of my head. I look enough like characters from Star Wars that it is being a bald gentleman wearing big headphones. So I don’t want big giant things sticking out of my face as well. When they get to the point where they’re eyeglasses and they’re just something we take for granted and it’s just an everyday like the phone is just a bit of metal we stick in our pocket.

Advertisements

And when it gets to that point, I think then we’ll reap the benefits of AR and who, who in this room? would not want to look at a group of students whilst on duty and have their names floating above them. So when they’re running down the corridor away from you, you can actually call after them and follow up without having to ask 20 people if they saw anything.

Alan: This is the Holy Grail. This was one of the problems I had when I was a teacher which is I never remembered names, particularly if I hadn’t taught them. And of course, computing teachers, we see 300 kids every year and then 300 new kids the next year because we only get one hour a fortnight or whatever. And loads of classes. And yeah. 

David: I’m not sure if you noticed this as well though, but like it’s 300 kids, but you see the back of their heads most of the day. So it’s very good at naming students. If I saw the, sometimes on parents evenings, I’d have to be like, Just turn around for a second. Oh, yes, I know. Yeah, 

Alan: I know the back of that head. Yes. Right. Okay. Um, Yeah you’ve touched on something I mentioned with Andy Colley on his podcast. Andy Colley does the Learning Dust podcast with Dave Leonard about ed tech and it’s brilliant. And he asked me what would I invent if I could invent anything to help teaching?

It would be, so like Google Glass, when you’re looking around the classrooms reading the brainwaves of the kids, so you can see confusion as red and understanding is green and all of that. So you could basically do a check for understanding by scanning the room. 

David: It’s hilarious because we we literally do that with Mindjoy, the conversations they have and we color code them. So like at a glance, you can see. That’s amazing. That’s like simultaneous thought. I love that. 

Alan: Well, it’s the future everyone’s got the mini whiteboards, so you ask the question, they hold up the mini whiteboards and you go, ah three quarters of them didn’t get it. If you could do that with technology instantly, then that, that would be great.

I’m sure that will come soon. But yes, just names. How many times I shout “Oi, you!”, and they give you fake names as well. That’s always hilarious. And the weird thing is you go on Sims or whatever your school system is and you look for these kids and I don’t know about you, but I think I’m, I think it’s called face blindness.

If I see just a mugshot of a child, I can’t say whether or not that was the child I saw running away from me down the corridor. 

David: It’s a completely different context as well. If I spend the time putting my makeup on and smiling beautifully for the camera and sucking in my gut, I look a little bit different than I do just walking around the corridor, slouching and, I think it’s a real big difference. And one of the, one of the interesting things there’s been a lot in the news recently about schools and public institutions using facial recognition and being like rightly so being brought to the information commissioners purview and told off about it and fined in some cases, because like I’m sure you’re aware of this, but if you introduce any biometric sort of measures you do need to give people an option to opt out and a more old fashioned sort of pin number style version. And I remember when we introduced a fingerprint based sign in and payment system in one of our schools, part of the budgeting process was just like, how many students do we think are going to opt out? How many smart cards are we going to need? Because if it becomes a meme, it’s going to, it’s not going to be worth installing. 

Alan: It hit the press, I don’t know, about 10 years ago when these fingerprint payment systems came in around schools and parents were outraged, apparently if you read the Daily Mail, but I think that’s par for the course. And they were going why do they need to fingerprint my child? And it’s just because they forget their lunch money or they forget a card, a payment card. That you give them or whatever. And we don’t want them to starve. It’s as simple as that. It wasn’t really because we’re evil and we want to collect all this data on children. It’s just this fear of technology though, isn’t it? And I guess we just need to make our communities understand it better, which is why we teach the subject of computing,

David: I think you’re right. I think like part of the thing for me was that the reason I got into teaching computer science was because, and this is the worst origin story for a teacher you’ll ever hear, right? But my computer science teacher in secondary school was god awful. And I won’t name him and shame him, but he was god awful. And I was the one in the classroom helping people out and getting people excited about it. And I was just like, oh, I love this subject. And I’ve just read about it myself. I can make people excited about this.

This is what people should be like. They should be fascinated with technology. Changing everything. And I did, when did my computer science degree and I trained to be a teacher because I wanted to achieve that. And I think, I think I did, I think I did a pretty good job, but it’s such an important thing that people understand what technology is, what the abstraction is, and what the impacts of it.

Like the big technology for me, the thing that I think is going to have the biggest impact on education full stop is AI. And I hadn’t really encountered this generation of AI until. I started working for Replit about two to three years ago, and at the time, OpenAI hadn’t released ChatGPT or anything like that. They didn’t have that big model in the works. What they had was an auto, like a fancy auto complete model. But we were looking at it internally and I was still teaching at the time and I remember going, oh my God, this is just, this is gonna blow people away. And I went into school and I was showing my sixth form. I was showing my GCSE students. I was like, look at this. I can, and it was very simplistic compared to what it is now, but I can give it a breakdown of what I want an essay to be and it’ll generate the text for it. And everyone was like, Oh my God, this is my homework for the next X years. And I’m there going, they’re not wrong. They’re not wrong. Why in the real world? Why would we, why would I not use a spell check in my day to day life? Why would I not use AI completion of things? And then, GPT came along and it was this. big thing. And everyone’s Oh God, there’s no jobs because AI does everything. I think it’s important that people know what AI is and what it’s good for.

And I think there’s a, there’s an issue with AI in the classroom because what people think is, Oh, I can do my worksheets and my reports. It’s ah, those things have existed forever. And let’s be honest. Who amongst us gets a worksheet from TES or whoever and just rolls it out into the classroom without looking at it or editing it ourselves? If you use third party resources without engaging in them and modifying them and going through that thought process, your teaching is going to be absolutely shocking. 

This is why most computer science teachers Most computer science teachers, worth their salt, sticklers for, Oh, no, I made this and I like my resource because I’m comfortable with every aspect, every facet of it. And so AI for me, isn’t like this thing that will fix the admin issue, the time issue in schools. Because let’s be honest, if we get more time back, they’ll find a way to fill it. For me, what AI is is a way of reducing a bottleneck in the classroom, which has always been there, and it’s you as a teacher.

You as a teacher, you might have the best relationships, you might have spent 20 years honing your craft, you may have the most amazing, exciting stories to introduce the concept of, I don’t know binary arithmetic, you know, you might have fun anecdotes, but at some point in that lesson you go 30 students, Off you go! And then four people put their hand up and you have to split your time up. And what AI is to me is a way of augmenting your teaching and using things like AI tutor bots to be like, okay, we’re going to go. There’s an AI tutor bot I’ve put the effort into that I know will work the way I want it to.

And I want you guys to go and use that. And what that does is that removes that initial Oh, what do I need to do? I don’t quite understand X, Y, and Z. And it opens up a lot of opportunities. That’s just really the most simplistic way you could possibly use anything, right? And it, but it’s such an augmentative, such a saving. And what that frees you up to do as a teacher, is instead of running around like a crazy person for an hour, you can actually It lets you target those interventions and it lets you make sure the people that need the help really get the help. And I think AI is going to be such a boon for us in the classroom.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

Once we get out of that mode we’re in now where we’re afraid to talk about it because the reality is that every student has used it to cheat on their homework and every teacher has used it to mark work or do a report and the twain do not talk about it because we feel like we’re cheating. And I think if we use the most appropriate use case, it’ll be much better.

Sorry, I interrupted 

Alan: you. Yeah, no, I absolutely, I love all that. And you said cheating then, and I wrote a blog on this six months ago or something, and I titled it, Stop Calling It Cheating. That was my blog title. And because I was so frustrated, if you want to be really frustrated Dave, you need to.

Join a Facebook group called ChatGPT4Teachers, and it’s mostly American teachers and they’re mostly trying to automate the worst pedagogical ideas ever, and of course, American schools, a lot of them are still stuck with the grade point average system. They do term papers and and mark them and give them a grade A to F and that becomes a grade point average and that decides whether you graduate or not.

And so right throughout their high school career, these kids are doing term papers and basically that’s how their understanding is judged, which is terrible. And even before AI, they were cheating by doing homework for each other and googling things and writing down what they found and all sorts.

And And suddenly there’s this, Oh my God, I can’t trust any of my kids term papers now. So how do I grade them? And what AI detectors are there so that I can check that they’re not cheating and all of this? And I’m in there trying to be the voice of reason going, if you’re setting a term paper, every term in all of 10, 11 subjects, then those poor kids are swamped with writing essays. All of their entire high school life to try and prove to you that they’ve remembered something that you taught badly in the first place. And they’re going to cheat. So stop doing that. And there is fortunately a movement in America called ungrading, which brings us back to more like what we do in this country, which is more formative assessment and far less graded papers.

David: I think one of the things that I think I’ve written a blog post, which should be out before this episode comes out, called The History of Cheating in Schools, where I sort of go through everything that I did as a student, because I like, I grew up at the transition from paper to computers to internet. So there was a significant difference in the way that I, I suppose, in quotes, cheated on my homework for the entire time that I was in school.

But if you examine every step, what happened is let’s take for instance a research homework in the days pre internet, pre computers. What did people do? They went to the library and they copied out of a book, right? Now, in the ideal world, that’s, I’ve got multiple sources, I’ve synthesized, I’ve done a good pedagogical strategy, but what the reality is for the vast majority of people is they literally copied it out.

And there’s research that suggests that actually is an element of pre learning and helps with mastery because you’ve got that sort of, it fires off the phonological loop and. What you end up with is it is a base layer understanding that when you cover it in lessons is enhanced. So the cheating, so to speak, was actually what was used and leveraged by teachers as pre learning. And I think that is if you go through every sort of, like I go through in the article Oh, then Microsoft Encarta, everyone literally copies and pastes the same text because there’s a limited supply. and what happened? 

Alan: CD ROM encyclopedias. I miss them. 

David: Exactly. If you were clever you bought one of the less popular ones and then you look like you knew what you were talking about, but everyone copied from Encarta. And it was like the, in every stage of this, and we’ve been stuck in the same sort of stage of this for 15 years with, we have Google for instance, good search, and we have Wikipedia, the repository of all human knowledge, but we’ve just hit a different milestone. And that is. That unique generative work can be created by anybody.

And in that situation, what you need to do is you need to stop making it a taboo. You need to stop being like, Oh God, we don’t talk about it. Please don’t use it. Because the reality is when these students end up in the world of work, AI tools are going to be like a spell check to them. They’re just going to use them. So we need to train them how to use it. So what you need to do is stop AI being this mystical, horrible thing that People feel like they’re cheating on and something you’re actually using your lesson. I say this a lot. I think if you think about what is the gold standard of academia? How, like what if you’re doing it, if you’re doing a a final thesis for your PhD, how do you get graded? You defend it orally. 

Alan: Orally. Absolutely. Yeah. 

David: Now, AI, can be used to simulate that entire thing. You can get a 10 year old, 11 year old to place in a piece of homework they’ve done and the AI can come back with. arguments with the opposite, and they have to defend it. And it’s a conversation. It’s not just I’ve programmed in four responses and it’s going to come through. It’s a genuine, generative conversation that makes the student more able to back up their thoughts and their feelings, which is a much better, and let’s be honest, if we say that’s the gold standard of academia, if we can bring that all the way down to the point at which we’re using it in like secondary education, gives the student a much more concrete awareness of.

the points they’re making and the arguments against them and why they think one thing. So for me, generative AI is this beautiful thing that coming into the classroom as a tutor, coming to the classroom as something to augment your teaching, really makes you more like the 10x teacher. I’m sorry, I use that phrase a lot. I don’t know if that’s very common in, it’s very common in Silicon Valley. So the idea of a 10x like engineer is that you start your career. You can do the work of one person. With tools, with experience, with automation, you can be, have 10x that impact. And the sort of the leading theory at the moment is that AI is the sort of thing that would drive you to, to be able to become the 100x engineer.

And this isn’t everyone, but this is the sort of things they give to people like Steve Wozniak and the types of people that can go on a weekend code bender and come out with a revolution. You know what I mean? We can all get to that stage with engineering and coding by leveraging these tools. But I genuinely think there’s a place for the 10x teacher in the classroom, because if you are an outstanding teacher, if you’re getting up there and smashing it every single day, then leveraging these tools, and I think importantly, not getting off the shelf stuff, not getting Oh, here’s a worksheet generator. Here’s something that will knock up my lesson objectives for me. Prompting those AIs yourself means that you’ve got control of it the same way you have control of that content. Sorry, go on. 

Alan: It’s alright, just on worksheet generator, that made me shiver. You know, Just the phrase worksheet actually makes me a little go cold. I think there’s been a Very obvious shift towards PowerPoints and worksheets in the last 10 15 years or so. And so again, going back to my blog I wrote a blog a couple of years ago about Nevermind, it’s called Nevermind the PowerPoint. And because I would, again, on Facebook teachers would go, has anyone got a PowerPoint on this? And it’s Boolean logic for year nine or something. And I realized that they were equating a PowerPoint with a lesson, and believing that the PowerPoint would magically deposit the knowledge into the kids heads and stuff. And it comes back to Andy Colley’s podcast, learning dust doesn’t fall out of the bottom of an iPad.

It equally doesn’t transmit itself from the whiteboard to the children’s heads through a PowerPoint. And the worksheet as the lesson or the worksheet as the product of the lesson, completely forgetting what we’re actually trying to do, which is make a change in children’s long term memories. They need to know more and be able to do more. And the, we’ve encouraged in a lot of classrooms, we’ve encouraged The children, the pupils, to believe that completing a worksheet is the goal of the lesson. And so they will have spaces on the worksheet and they will point to them and go, look, there’s something in each space. Therefore, I have achieved what you wanted me to achieve, sir, or miss or whatever. And teachers will be happy with this and they’ll say things like on Adam Boxer’s podcast, he was very scathing about a result on the TeacherTap app, which is this survey app that teachers can fill in that said do you mind children chatting in lessons as long as they’re getting their work done?

And 50 percent of teachers said, yeah, that’s fine. And he was furious about that because it’s all about the concentration. But I think what we’ve What we’ve come to understand as teachers, a lot of teachers have come to understand that completing the worksheet is the lesson. Going through the PowerPoint and transmitting the stuff followed by completing a worksheet is the lesson. And I think the art of teaching is being lost in all of this in order to, I don’t know, to perform, to show that you’re doing something, to have something to mark. And I think we need to get back to, telling stories, encouraging children to love the subject for itself and to love the journey of learning rather than produce, producing an end product on a piece of paper.

David: Absolutely. I think, I think I’ve said at the start of this podcast, big fan of your books read them for fun. I am not a very popular slash employable teacher slash head of department slash deputy head as I was in schools, because I am very opinionated. And I do not believe in following. Don’t say. Shockingly, shocking no one. I don’t believe in following the the breadcrumb trail left by people that are trying to commoditize and standardize things into a worksheet. Let’s look at the present, not even the future, the present. The present is I generate a worksheet or a PowerPoint with AI.

I give it to my students. They answer it with AI. I mark it with AI. Who does any work in that? It’s just busy work. It is dancing around this concept of what education is from God knows the 19th century. I agree with you completely. What education is, is telling stories, hooking into those young person’s brains and encoding the information in their brains in the most useful way.

I had a brilliant lecturer at university. I did a module which. was about communication ostensibly, but he was a like a film director a local one. And after the initial, two weeks of here’s how we format communication, it was, let’s make a film, shall we? And his teaching was brilliant because he always, he said to me just one day, he’s like, Oh, I seem to have lost the room.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

I’ll tell you an anecdote now. And I was like, That works. So my entire teaching career, my entire teaching persona, and I say persona because I do believe it’s, there’s an element of it’s an exaggerated form of yourself a lot of the time to be comfortable. But like my teaching persona is very much, I have taken millions of stories from around the web and just turned them into anecdotes that involve me or my friends. I don’t have many friends. It’s, I haven’t done that much in my life. but I’ve got all these little anecdotes to hook ideas into people’s brains. And I, that is what teaching is to me. It is not marking. I was always like, for the first five years of my career, I had this existential guilt. People would be going home with bags of books and tick and tick.

And I would mark two or three things, a term which are meaningful. And I don’t like, why would I, The worst thing for me was when this idea of differentiated work became very popular and what, what, what the conceptualization was. I agree with, I am very much a scaffolding guy. So like the project, the idea, the thing we’re building is the same for everyone. We’d like you to get to this same place. But what I’m going to do as a teacher is I’m going to give. Scaffolding, so that if you need more help to get there, there is more things in place to help you get there. But what this idea of differentiated work turned into was, look at this perfect example. Here is, I don’t know, modern foreign language X.

Here’s a worksheet with lots of gaps, Here’s a worksheet with less gaps. Here’s a worksheet with less gaps in the words written in the bottom. And I’m like how is, this is not differentiation. This is three different worksheets that, that’s complete the box. I don’t understand the pedagogy behind it. And maybe that’s why I’m such a big Pedagogy Nerd. That’s why that’s why, to be honest working at Mindjoy has been amazing for me because everything in the company is pedagogy focused. Everyone’s teachers, everyone’s very much we understand the science of learning, we want it to happen.

And you used this beautiful phrase just a few minutes ago, which was, I think that the art of teaching is being lost. I think there is an artistry to the best teaching, but I think the vast majority of teaching is learnable and science. And I think the differentiating factor between a solidly good lesson and an outstanding lesson is the little bit of spark and joy that you can bring with our artistry as a teacher. And that, think about your favorite teachers as a child or as an adult, who made the biggest marks on you? For me, it was the weird and wacky ones. It was the ones with the best stories. It was the ones that weren’t absolute fascists. And I think that if you are going into a classroom to teach young people, you’ve got to go in with the idea that the only thing you can change in that classroom to influence them is you.

No amount of worksheets, no amount of content that you buy that you get from elsewhere. is going to influence how they engage with your lesson. That’s you. That’s your behavior. That’s the way you act. That’s the things you present them with. That’s your idea of pedagogy and what you like to do. And it is stuff that you can learn. And your book very rightly covers a lot of that. And your podcast with Andy Colley, was absolutely exciting. Like I was geeking out when you mentioned my favorite theory, which is semantic waves, which when I read that, I was like, Oh my God, there’s a word for what I’ve been doing. Wow. And I think so much of pedagogy and research is giving people a shared vocabulary to talk about.

And what I love about the future we’re heading towards is we’re heading towards a future where I can model a singular pedagogical style inside an AI, and I can push that AI to a student who can experience that, but they can experience it from a system that’s, That hasn’t had a bad night staying up with the baby. That hasn’t got 7B next, who are going to be screaming. There’s a bunch of things that AI has, which is which if you program it, you prompt it well, and that’s a skill we need to get as teachers as well. I think that’s worth saying. As a teacher, you need to go and learn how to prompt AIs because you don’t want to be someone who buys things off the shelf and has to use what’s there.

You want to be somebody that goes, actually I want to change this lesson in this way because I think this would be better for my learners. Again, the only thing you can change in the classroom is you. And the only thing you can change with AI is if you can adapt the prompt, learn how to do it. Come along to my workshops. That’s what we do there. We talk about those things. It’s a skill for the future. It is something you need because if you’ve got the skills to tell these bots how to interact with these students, how to bring these pedagogical strategies. I spent the weekend building a semantic waves bot because I was like, I need to turn this into something that I can push because I’m a massive nerd.

Like what else are the people at the football on Saturday? I’m there. with my notes out and my research and tapping away at a prompt and being like, can this work? Is this for me? And 

Alan: I think that one, I think that one sentence Dave probably sums up this podcast. I’m going to cut that out and I’m going to, I’m going to post it on social media. Um, “I spent the weekend making a semantic waves bot” said Dave, the lesson hacker. 

David: I like that idea, just the nerdiest quotes. 

Alan: This has become a very niche podcast now. Very niche podcast. 

David: Computer scientists who spend their Saturdays doing work. The thing is, there are hardware people, right? There are hardware people that spend their weekends with their Raspberry Pis and their soldering irons doing amazing projects.

I’d love to be one of those people. But My brain works with software. My brain is I’ve got this hardware in front of me, which is super capable. What can I do with it? And I think the reason that, again, we had a list of topics to talk about today. We had VR. I think I’ve covered that very quickly. I’m like too expensive, but cool. 

Alan: We had, we had robotics. We can maybe rattle through a few other topics before we wind up, but 

David: yeah, go on. I think like I can sum up robotics in a sentence for you. I’m like, Cool, but too expensive. Software is the only thing that we have in school that we can actually make an investment in a reasonable way. And especially if you’re on a departmental level budget. Now, I I was, I, as I said, most of my career is like a head of departments. I did a little bit of like senior leadership stuff. And then you’re talking about Big money, but you’re talking about big money that has to tick all the boxes across a school.

When you’re in a departmental level and you’re looking at software, you’re looking at things that are going to improve and enhance what you’re doing, but the money’s not a lot. So you can’t, again, I’m talking from a state school point of view here, but you can’t go out and you can’t go out and say, Yes, I’ve bought 30 Raspberry Pis and a bunch of kits and all these little bits, and we’re going to have a three week project doing hardware because, it’s just not affordable, is it?

And especially the rate at which those things end up getting destroyed because students make mistakes, as they should. I, the most costly lesson I ever had was when I brought in a processor that I was going to reuse in a different PC and was showing the students it, and they were having a look at it. And one of the students bent all the pins on it accidentally. 

And in that moment, I was like, that was a couple of hundred pounds down the drain because I was excited about showing them something. That happens all the time. With software, what you end up with is something that can push along the pedagogy, can push along the teaching and learning, can give you tools that isn’t going to cost the earth and that will run on pretty much anything.

And I taught a lot in one to one schools or schools where devices were like a thing that they could have, because I very that’s me. I very much think that if I can whip out my phone at any minute and look something up, students should be able to too, because I’ve taught in schools where the rules for teachers and rules for students were very different and I find it very hard to enforce rules on students that I don’t have to follow myself.

Advertisements

I’m like, I am a person that I like, I have lots of piercings, right? You probably don’t notice it on my videos a lot because they’re not very flashy, but whenever anybody meets me in real life, they go, Have you always had those piercings? And I genuinely remember having to crack down on, and this is in the last couple of years, crack down on piercings in students.

And I’m sat there with two fresh ear studs at the top of my ear. And I’m like how does that work? And it’s the same with phones. I think if there’s an expect, with any sort of device. We have, we as a culture now rely on this ability to pull out information at the drop of a hat to look things up.

And I do that all the time. If I’m in a conversation with a student and that they say, Oh, what about this? And I’m like, Oh, I’m not quite sure. Let’s have a look. If I’ve got my laptop there, I’ll look it up. But if I haven’t, the phone comes out because I’m like, Yeah, this, the conversation improves, the learning improves. Students should be able to do those same things. 

Alan: I can see that, but I can also even I struggle with the discipline of, getting your device out to look up the one thing and not go, Oh, I’ll scroll Twitter or threads these days rather than Twitter or whatever it’s called. 

David: Is threads still alive? I haven’t been on it in a while. 

Alan: Oh, it’s great now. Yeah. No, jump, jump back into threads. 

David: I have to jump in because one of the questions, one of the questions I had is I was big into EduTwitter when it was like a big thing with 10, 15 years ago. And recently, people don’t even argue during the holidays anymore.

What’s happened to EduTwitter? What’s going on? So where have people gone? 

Alan: I wrote a blog six months ago now saying, I’ve quit X, you should too. Because I just documented the fall of Twitter and how it’s been taken over by a white supremacist. I’m not joking. It is a dangerous place now for academics because if you believe in equality or diversity, you will get attacked.

If you, even if you talk about climate change, you will get attacked. If you say anything, what they call woke, you’ll get attacked. And those attacks, 

David: I’ve got the trans flag in my bio. I get attacked all the time. 

Alan: Exactly. But that’s the thing, but we know that these these attacks can spill over into the real world as in people get physically attacked and there have been the owner of Twitter or the owner of X himself has amplified Right wing attacks on vocal students and so on and force people into hiding. It is a horrible place. So anyway, that’s my little rant about it. 

David: I don’t think it’s a rant. I don’t think, I don’t think it’s unnecessary. I think the important thing as teachers is that we’re all very aware. We need to model the behaviors we want to see in the real world to our students.

And unfortunately the sort of interactions that you have on X and Twitter with the extreme. Minority. Yeah. And not the sort of things you want to model. So I can completely understand why so many educators have fell away. But I really miss that community of practice, that sort of critical friend, that, that group of educators that would just go, I’m trying this, what do you think? And then it would be a great conversation about those one things. Now I found those practice, I found smaller versions of those communities of practice on LinkedIn, certainly. Which is, at least it’s. At least it’s unblocked in most schools because it’s like a business y thing.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

And there’s private Facebook groups which replicate it, but I think I still miss the ability for me, I finished my dinner. There’s nothing really on TV. I’ve got no mini projects to do. What can, what conversations are going on about education? Things I actually care about?

Alan: No, absolutely. So in an ideal world, I’d love the kids to be able to whip out their devices and look things up. I just, I feel that the temptation to do other things and the possibility of distraction, which there’s a lot of evidence for, means that that’s a really difficult thing to to, to manage.

David: I do agree. And I think in the same breath. I agree. And I think that I have no beef with schools that ban phones or ban devices at all. I don’t, they’re just not for me. They’re not my sort of school because I think this is important with the way that teachers, we’re going off, off topic a little bit here, but I think it’s important for how teachers apply for schools as well.

I used to apply for schools with a CV. Which was very colorful, which was very graphic design y, which had jokes in it, which had a silly picture of me pulling a face. And I would do that because I know that teachers where everyone’s poo faced and are very serious about things aren’t schools for me. So teach, like anybody that would get that CV in a bundle of an application and go, Bring this guy in, let’s see what we want to talk to him about. That’s a school for me and that did me very well in my career.  

Alan: It’s a good message. To be honest, as a computer science teacher, we are in a privileged position in which we are much in demand and we can probably work anywhere. So that’s going to work for us, where it might not work for an art teacher, ironically. Because the art teacher is often more likely to have the piercings and nail polish and so on. But um, but yeah, use your privilege computing teachers. You are much in demand and if you’re not enjoying where you are and you can’t be yourself in the classroom, have a look around.

David: Yeah. 

Alan: Absolutely. 

 Well, it was bound to happen sooner or later when I get talking to someone fascinating and we bounce ideas around, we can’t stop. David and I talked for nearly 90 minutes and I ended up with far too much content for one episode. So I’m splitting this bumper recording over two episodes of the pod. You can look forward to the second half. Where Dave and I really get into AI next week on how to teach computer science. 

 However, towards the end of our chat, Dave issued me a challenge. Let’s hear what happened as I skip to what became the mind joy chatbot challenge.

Alan: My favorite. Chatbot at the minute really is probably cs50. ai from Harvard because it’s, it’s got guardrails so it doesn’t hallucinate quite as much about um, some stuff and, and it’s better.

David: I’m putting faces at you, but I’ll tell you why in a minute. 

Alan: Yeah, so Dave’s making a funny face for those listening about the word guardrails. So it’s about the CS50 bot in particular. CS50 bot. Um, Yeah, so you can ask it questions about programming and it’ll uh, it’ll guide you towards the answer rather than just, here’s the code. It’ll have a Socratic conversation, as you mentioned earlier. What are your, What are your issues with CS50 then? 

David: So the reason I sort of sucked my teeth and did the, the um, ooo emoji, is because that is a commoditization of very simple prompting. And I have an issue with commoditization of, again, we talked about this, worksheet generators. In my mind, the CS50 bot is the same as a worksheet generator. It is a closed system. It is something that I can’t impact as a teacher. It is something that I can’t edit the bot is great, but it’s a general purpose teaching bot. And there’s so much more we can do with AI if we make AI part of the lesson and we build the lesson around, I’ll get the, I’ll get the bot to do this, that will help the students do this.

And therefore, the lesson can be different. It can be more exciting. It can be, like you can build a bot to help the student with PRIMM, to help them work through how they should do it. Let them have those questions. I think it will do this. And the AI can come back and say actually, let’s have a look at how that would work. And the conversations that you would have, they are what I want from an AI, not this generic tool. So that’s why I was sucking my teeth. 

Alan: No, absolutely. I think that. The situation is that probably you could build a better bot than cs50. ai, but not all the teachers listening to this. 

David: I would say anyone listening to this podcast can build a better bot than cs50 have got at the moment. And I’m no shade on cs50, they’ve done a great job, it’s a beautiful bot, but I guarantee you if everyone listening to this podcast sign up for one of my workshops and I give them half an hour on prompt engineering, right? We will all be building bots that are suitable for our classrooms, suitable for our learners, who we know better. I promise you if you want, I’ll send you a code and we can send out an invite to all the audience. I promise you every person in this, listening to this podcast can do a better job than CS50 with 30 minutes of training and a bit of time twiddling around with it. 

Alan: I, challenge accepted, Dave. What I’ll do is I’ll get on a call with you after this, I will take you up on your offer and we’ll build a bot together. And have some fun. Um, Talking of fun. 

David: What I will say is in May, we are having a computer science themed month at Mindjoy. workshops will be all based on computer science. Like what we’re pushing out will be based around computer science, which is great because I know computer scientists, so that’s a bit of fun. But like. 

Alan: Where can we find out, where can we find out more about those workshops, Dave?

David: This is actually set up well, mindjoy. com, MINDJOY. COM is where you’ll find all the workshops and all the stuff we’re doing with AI. But genuinely, like I, I know that I’ve gone on about AI a lot this episode, and we have gone very long, my friend, which I, because we’ve been enjoying ourselves, I think.

Alan: I think that is probably a good point to start wrapping up. It seems we started talking about wrapping up about an hour ago. I think probably we should. 

David: I’m off to start prompting AI in the random bits of pedagogy to see what I can do. 

Alan: Dave, it’s been brilliant I will take you up on your offer. Thanks for coming on.

David: No worries, buddy. I appreciate it. And long may this podcast keep going. Cause I have a great time listening to it. 

Alan: Thank you very much. Thanks for your kind words about the podcast and the books.

David: If you’ve not bought the books, please do. Learn, how to learn computer science is my favorite of the two.

Alan: Alright then Dave, have a nice day. I’ll catch up with you again soon. Cheers. Thank you. Bye then.

 So it’s happening. David Morgan and I are hosting a live event on Thursday, 9th of May, 2024. at, 5:00 PM. See mind joy.com. And scroll down to upcoming events or see my blog . httcs.online/blog, or check the podcast, show notes for more details. David and I will create a coding companion live on air. I have no idea what’s going to happen, but I’m sure it will be lit as the kids apparently don’t say anymore. So it’s nearly time to wrap up. I’m going to play beat saber on my Meta quest. I was thinking about VR after our chat. And I, I wear glasses and it’s a bit of a hassle getting the headset on. And the other issue is no one else can see what I’m doing unless I cast to the TV. And that’s a bit of a faff as well. And while I’m using it, nobody else in the family can. So I thought. Wouldn’t it be good if we all had a headset each, but that’s expensive and we still couldn’t see each other or share popcorn and stuff like that. So maybe. What we need is one big VR headset we can all use maybe a big room sized one we walk into with a big screen at the end. And. And comfy seats. So you can enjoy a movie together and share popcorn and maybe a hot dog. That would be amazing. 

 So that was a fun episode to make our attempt to answer the question. What is the future of work and school. Part two is coming next week. Hope you enjoyed our ramblings. Let me know in the comments or on the socials. This has been how to teach computer science, the podcast I’m Alan Harrison, please do visit my website. HTTCS dot online and buy my books. Don’t forget. You heard David tell you how much he enjoyed the books today. And don’t forget last week, Dave Hillyard of Craig and Dave said this. 

Dave: I think the final thing I would say is that your book is great. How to teach computer science, I think, is excellent for teachers. How to learn computer science, I think, is essential reading for all students, and my recommendation would be get a class set, and I’m not just saying this because you’re the author, I genuinely mean it. Get a class set of these books, hand them out, that is your background reading. 

So buy the books, if you already have the books, buy me a coffee, please at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs all links on my blog at HTTCS dot online slash blog. And subscribe now. So you don’t miss a thing. Check out mindjoy.com or my blog for the live event on the 9th of May. So have a great weekend and I’ll catch you next week.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!
Categories
HTTCS leadership podcast teaching and learning

Podcast Episode 7: “How Hard Can it Be?”

A new episode is live, featuring the wonderful Rachel Arthur of Teach First. Listen now here:

Transcript

Alan: Welcome to how to teach computer science, the podcast. This is episode seven. How hard can it be? I’ll be answering that question and many more. With help of today’s special guest. 

Rachel: Nothing’s real. What is real anymore? No. We’re all in the 

Alan: matrix, and maybe I’m a deepfake. Oh, well that would just be the 

Rachel: twist, wouldn’t it? 

Alan: More on that in a moment. My name is Alan Harrison, and I wrote the books how to teach computer science and how to learn computer science available in online bookstores, more details at the companion website. HTTCS dot online. That’s the initials of how to teach computer science HTTCS dot online. And if you haven’t bought the books yet, why not? We’re talking about training to teach today. I remember my teacher training. Well, and I was already blogging at HTTCS dot online slash blog. So I can look back at those days. 

And so can you, here’s what I wrote. In 2016. About this time. Last year, I was reveling in the joy of my first ever taught lesson. That lesson was exciting, a bit crazy and lots of fun. It went as well as could be expected. No, really. I was treated to some mentor feedback containing the words, the best first lesson I have ever seen. 

Thank you so much, Sarah. Today I’ll call that a punch the air day. But trust me, teacher training got much harder after that included one lesson. I will never forget. I had asked the year eights to complete a task in Excel and print it out, forgetting that a full print of my Excel spreadsheet would be six pages. Each. Times 30. On a printer that didn’t do double-sided and I asked them to start printing with five minutes left of the lesson. And there were no names on the printouts. 

 So as my mentor sat watching and yes, quietly laughing at me, trying to organize a queue for the printer with enthusiastic kids, grabbing individual sheets and shouting, whose is this waving lots of completely identical pieces of paper. I realized teaching is a roller coaster. Some days you’re up there in control, conducting an orchestra of kids, all making progress. 

 I seem to have mixed my metaphors back in 2016. Other days, nothing will work and the music will sound awful. That day. I went home feeling pretty down and metaphorically kicked the dog. Quiet password 15 hash. Don’t worry. If you have a kick the dog day know that you tried your best reflect, get advice. Change things, fix it for next time. 

The only bad teacher is the teacher that repeats mistakes. The teacher that doesn’t reflect refuses, advice and rejects growth. Be the teacher that reflects on every experience, learns from their mentor and from other teachers and changes things up for the next lesson. So not bad advice from eight year ago, me. But. My guest today has some cracking advice. Probably much better than that. And some of it isn’t about babies and toddlers. Let’s hear what happened when I spoke to Rachel Arthur and asked the question. How hard can it be?

Rachel: Hi Alan.

Alan: Hi, how are you? 

Rachel: I’m good, thank you. How are you? 

Alan: Yeah, great. How’s the little one? 

Rachel: Yeah, she’s good, thank you. She’s actually just fallen asleep, so I’ve just handed her tentatively over to my husband, so he can wander around holding her until we’re brave enough to attempt putting her down. Hands very much full, but it gets easier, I think. Yeah. 

Alan: Yeah. It gets easier in many ways and then harder in others. But you do get a bit more sleep soon. 

Rachel: Yeah. Yes. Yes. That’s my main. 

Alan: We were very lucky. 

Rachel: at all . She’s sleeping through the night at the moment yeah.

Good. I can’t complain, we’ve been very lucky with both of them so.

Alan: We were quite lucky. We went off skiing, with the in laws when, our eldest was like six weeks old, 

Rachel: I think you just have to get on with it, don’t you? We’re going to the lake district at the weekend and we’re like, why are we taking a 10 week old on holiday? This is a nightmare. Like all the stuff that we’ve got to pack. We’re like, if we don’t go, then you just, it’s just the same nightmare at home. 

Alan: We went to see Michael McIntyre and he said your single friends, they, they phone up and say, you going for a drink? And when you’re single, you go, yeah. You put the phone down, you walk out the door. And like when you’ve got kids, you have to pack a small bag with everything in it that you own, just in case your house isn’t there when you get back. 

Rachel: It’s so true. My husband was just like, Oh, I think we’re going to have to get a roof rack I was like, 

Alan: just to go out for the day. Yeah. Sorry. We haven’t got enough stuff. Yeah. 

Yeah. 

Rachel: Oh, but the podcast is going well. 

Alan: Have you been listening? 

Rachel: Yeah, I’ve not listened to all of them but our night feeds have been up listening, tuning in, so it’s going really well, isn’t it? Like you seem to be getting a lot of support and a lot of people are engaging with it, which is lovely to see.

Alan: It’s been great. I’ve had comments like, oh, this is the right thing at the right time, and just, computing teachers need a bit of a boost right now, and I think all teachers need a bit of a boost right now. I think 

Rachel: it’s something that’s the way you do it is really nice, but I think it’s something that’s specific for computing teachers as well, because I think there’s a lot of generic teaching stuff out there, but it doesn’t really apply to computing a lot of the time, so it’s nice to have something that’s specific.

Alan: I was thinking of doing it for ages, and then two things happened. Tom Rogers, who runs Teacher Talk Radio, hassled me about doing a radio show, and I never ended up doing that, but I might yet. Tom, if you’re listening, I might do that and the other thing that happened is I’ve been listening to Adam Boxer and Amy Forrester. Yeah, they’re really good. Yeah, and thinking, oh how hard can it be? And I was listening to them going, oh I need to do this now.

So I just need to start recording it. It started off at 25 minutes and then the latest ones are like 43 minutes. Yeah, 

Rachel: and is the edit a nightmare or has it not been too bad? 

Alan: Being a computer geek like I am, I have discovered some software. I did my research, I googled a lot of things, and then I found some software called Descript, which I’m now paying 24 a month for. Descript does something amazing, which is I will upload this recording into it, it will transcribe, and then give me a page which edits like a Word document, and I edit the words. And it deletes the audio that matches the words, so I’m not sitting there like Audacity cutting and splicing audio and looking for the peaks that match the words.

It’s done that for me, so it’s actually much easier. So never one to make life easy for myself. Now that I can do that, I decided to edit in lots of music and stupid things as well just to make it entertaining. So 

Rachel: yeah, I think that’s what. What people are saying about it, people are enjoying listening because it’s different and it’s enjoyable and it’s light. It’s not another heavy, let’s have a deep dive. I mean, We can talk about pedagogy, but 

Alan: yeah and, we will, we’ll talk about computing. Teaching and pedagogy and stuff like that, but we’ll try and chuck in some jokes, because like Andy Colley said, there’s not many jokes and most of them are quite corny, so I’m saying to all my guests, if you can, if you’ve got any computer related humor, then, do bring it along.

Rachel: Oh, I need to be more prepared. I’m not, oh, 

Alan: I didn’t. 

Rachel: I’ll have to I don’t want to let your audience down with my lack of computing jokes, but I’ll see if I can come up with something. 

Alan: Have a think as we’re talking and anyway, it’s all right. I’ll edit some jokes in later. Yes. I’ll tell you what, I’ll put your voice through an AI deepfake machine. That 

Rachel: would scare, scare, horrify and it’s super exciting isn’t it, things like that, but there’s some really The accuracy of these deep fakes now, you could have me saying anything on here, couldn’t you? In fact, you even need me here. I can just go and you can just type in. 

Alan: I think I’ve got enough there now, Rachel, so you can go and I will just put words into your mouth for the next 20 minutes. Thank you very much. 

Rachel: Perfect. I’ll go get some sleep. 

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

Alan: Good. It’s lovely to talk to you and yeah, I’ll catch up again soon. Yeah, right now I’ll start the AI deepfake Rachel and talk to that, right?

Hello AI deepfake Rachel. How are you? 

Rachel: I mean, What would a deepfake say? It would probably go very stereotypical and say I am fine, thank you. It’s definitely even better than that. 

Alan: Yeah, this has got a bit surreal, so I think we probably need to get back to the script. Do we have a script? No, not really. I had some questions I was going to ask. So the first thing is I’ve been talking to you like, like I know you, because I do, but my listeners probably don’t. First of all, Rachel Arthur, nice to meet you would you like to tell everybody what you do for the listeners, please? 

Rachel: Yeah, what do I do?

So I am Head of Computing at Teach First. So that means that I am in charge of the initial teacher training programme. That we run and I get involved in all the teacher training materials that touch computing. So whether it’s our NPQ offer, which is more for leadership or our training materials for primary teachers or for secondary teachers, they all fall within my remit, my team, so that’s what I spend my days doing.

But before I was in teacher education, I was a teacher myself, so I worked in teaching. Secondary schools in London Leeds and Oldham, sunny Oldham, over my teaching career and eventually became assistant head after, the usual route of head of department, subject lead, all of those things.

So yeah, that’s me. 

Alan: Good stuff. So teach first then, which is one of the routes into teaching. So what, if someone’s listening to this thinking, I want to train to teach computing what would their choices be?

What would they have to consider? 

Rachel: Firstly, please do. Absolutely do it because it’s a brilliant subject and there’s so much joy to be found in the computing classroom and you won’t regret it. But there’s loads of different routes.

 They split into school centered training, so like Teach First do, or like they call it a SCITT, but school centred initial teacher training, the training is done predominantly in the school setting, but you get your qualification at the end, like you would do through other routes, or you do a more traditional route, like a PGCE or an undergraduate degree where you train with the university and with that you do usually two or three placements over the year where you get to go and experience different school settings. 

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

So most of the routes into teaching are either the traditional university route or a school centred approach either through Teach First or one of the other training providers or the school running them yeah, you get to train in a school, but you are usually spending the majority of your time just in that one school rather than across multiple settings like you would in a University course. 

Alan: Do you get to go to other schools for brief placements? 

Rachel: Yes, so on Teach First we do a two week and sometimes it’s extended depending on the circumstances of the trainee but they do a two week placement in an alternative setting and they also do a primary placement so if you’re training to be a secondary teacher you also do some time in another phase which is Always interesting to see, see how they get on in a primary setting as well. They do get that kind of breadth of experience but it’s you are treated as an employee. Oh, hello. 

Alan: Sorry. This is what happens when I do podcast recordings in the evening. This is Casper, my Patterdale terrier, who decides he wants to get In on it. 

Rachel: He wants to train, to teach, he’s so intrigued by what we’re talking about.

Yes, one second. 

Alan: Oh God, yeah, that’s not great podcasting, is it? Here’s my dog on the Teams call, and he chose not to even say anything. There you go. I’ll edit some, so I’ll edit some dog barking in later and that’ll make sense to the listeners.

 You see? Magic of computing. None of this is real. 

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

As I say, you know, I’m talking to a deepfake, so you know. Um, So anyway, yeah, my placements were fun, I don’t know if I’ve ever spoken to you about this. But my placements, if I can just talk about them, one of them was right at my doorstep, literally just a stone’s throw away which was handy so I could roll out of bed and just rock up. And that was nice and it’s a nice local school and that was quite, what should we say, easy first placement in the sense that there wasn’t a lot of behavior challenge. And then, I don’t know if you ever saw Educating Greater Manchester? 

Rachel: Oh I did, yeah. Oh 

Alan: yes, so that school, so I was there, it was called Harrop fold then, so that was my. Yeah, that was my second placement school, so I was there. So that was a interesting school. So it’s good to have a contrast. So it’s nice to know that, you spend some time in another school and see some of that on the Teach First program.

Rachel: Yeah. The Teach First program We deliberately place our trainees in, underserved communities, so where there’s the greatest need for the highest quality of teachers, and often in schools that people wouldn’t necessarily choose to teach in, it wouldn’t be their first choice, it might be a more challenging area, for many reasons and we find that our trainees absolutely love the schools that they’re placed in. I did the teacher first program myself when I was training and I trained in an amazing school called Carmanna in Leeds, which is, it’s an excellent school and it’s in an underserved community and that’s why it’s a Teach first school, but the staff and the pupils there were fantastic, but I went to, I won’t name the other school I went to, but it was a leafy Very privileged school and I found it really, I thought I’m going to love this.

It’s going to be really great, but I remember saying to the pupils has anyone got any questions after I just explained something and no one put their hand up and then I was. I was doing questioning with the class and nobody was coming back to me with anything, and I was expecting, I was so used to all these characters and the banter in my classroom, so it was quite a surprise, but I found I got through a lot more content, so I don’t know what that was.

Yeah, 

Alan: that’s one thing. Yeah, a colleague said to me on my PGCE who got placed in a high performing school an affluent area, he said, I’m not planning enough stuff for the lessons because they’re just like eating it up like a sponge and I need to put more challenge into all my lessons and it’s breaking me, so he’s basically teaching maybe twice as much content in a lesson, but I know what you mean about not getting that feedback.

I think there can be in a school where the pupils are used to success and getting everything right, and there can be a reluctance to fail, so a reluctance to to try and to answer questions and get it wrong there can be an absence of culture of error in environments like that. Do you find that?

Rachel: Yeah, absolutely, and I think there’s this massive misconception that More affluent areas would be higher performing and that isn’t necessarily the case, especially in computing. I think you can really see that success in any, with any child from any background. And that’s the beauty of computing, isn’t it?

But that absence of wanting to be seen to be failing can really cause problems when you’re teaching programming because if they’re not willing to give it a go, then that fear of failure or fear of, having to debug a piece of code, can really put pupils off, which is a barrier to learning it, in itself.

Advertisements

Different challenges in different places, like just a different type of challenge rather than People say, Oh, that school’s really challenging. And I don’t, I think all schools have their own challenges. It just depends what flavor of challenge you’re best equipped to deal with. 

Alan: Absolutely.

Absolutely. I think, I mentioned culture of error then and the reluctance to try and fail is a real barrier and you see it I ran an escape room. If you go on my blog, the instructions for building it are there. I basically bought a pirate’s chest type thing and one of those lockout hasps which is a a lock with six padlocks on it and each of the padlocks had a different clue and so on and the kids loved it and my brilliant year 10, my brilliant GCSE class they loved it and then I tried it with like year 7 and 8 And they just didn’t want to try hard at solving clues, and they were looking at a clue, and it was, a clue to Ada Lovelace and her birthday, and that was the combination on the padlock, and they were looking at them going, I don’t know what that is and just wanting to either know or not know and not to actually think about it. These were puzzles and they, there was zero resilience and zero willingness to work out a puzzle from these kids. And I found that really strange because I always loved puzzles as a child, but the, I think, What I’m saying is probably the resilience has taken a knock and maybe that’s a COVID thing. Yeah, 

Rachel: I think it’s massively important in a computing classroom that resilience, even more so than other subjects, I think it is often not thought that Resilience and computing go hand in hand, especially by non specialists or people from other subject areas.

And when you’re talking about, building cultural capital or links the real world and that resilience for the workplace and for the future, computing is the perfect place to demonstrate that. But I think, It’s not always obvious to other people, so it’s so important to instill that, and it’s really similar to PE in some ways, you’re learning a skill, you’ve got to keep practicing and practicing, and you’re not going to shoot on target in your first game of football every time, so you know, you’ve got to keep going and keep trying

Advertisements

Alan: yeah, I was talking last week to Harry and Anna Wake of Mission Encodable they were saying about, sometimes learning to program can be dull. And I think I’ve been guilty of teaching programming in a very dull way and just do, you do hello world and then you do what is your name? Hello Bob or whatever I call the program. Hello Bob. And then you might ask a quiz question. What’s the capital of France? I don’t do that anymore. I do turtle graphics and, we do fireworks and stuff like that. And I do text adventure games and things because kids can write a text adventure game in 20 lines of Python. And there’s a world that didn’t exist before with monsters in it, you know, and that’s, 

Rachel: Yeah, 

Alan: so that’s what I do now. I don’t do hello world and hello Bob and what’s the capital of Paris anymore. I do, give your monster a name and give him a, a thing to say. Does he bark or does he grunt and all of that? Oh, they’re making monsters in a text adventure. 

Rachel: It’s so much more inclusive as well to teach like that because, I am a massive Advocate for engaging as many girls and as possible in computing and anyone from any background getting the most diverse cohort that we possibly can.

I think it’s so important and what you’ve just described is making it relevant, isn’t it, to those pupils and adapting that lesson and that learning so they can find a hook that they’re interested in. And that makes such a big difference for all of those groups that, aren’t traditionally choosing to do GCSE computer science, but that’s where I’ve seen the biggest changes in my classroom when I’ve let kids pick what they’re interested in and because computing is so great if you can, it could be.

It could be anything from a text adventure game about robots or pirates or princesses or whatever anyone’s interested in, all the way through to, we used to do a chat for Ordering a pair of jeans on ASOS because loads of the kids were online shopping and that’s what they were interested in.

And that kind of call and response from an online shopping website, they were interested in how that works. So just following the pupils interest really helps with that. 

Alan: definitely. So that’s how we teach. Programming, so coming back to teacher training then, so what makes a good trainee?

Rachel: Oh, anyone who is interested in learning, like I, when I first started in my role at Teach First um, three and a half years ago now I was talking to recruitment about What I wanted my trainees to be and what qualifications they needed to have and, the recruitment process for joining the training program.

And anyone that’s listening to this that works at a university will have had similar conversations like designing the interview questions for people training to teach. It’s a really interesting process. And they said to me, do you want them to have an undergraduate degree in computing? And I said, no, and recruitment said.

What? And I said they can do, that would be lovely if they did have a degree in computing and I’m absolutely here for that. However, it depends when they did their degree, because if we’re talking about career changes who are a bit older and did their degree a few years ago, it wouldn’t have been called computing then, it might have been called IT.

Advertisements

You can call a computing degree so many different things, and actually there’s such limited links to the GCSE curriculum to a computing degree. I didn’t feel like it was a necessity for them to have it. I felt much more passionate that they were interested in programming and interest in teaching the breadth of the computing curriculum, which is often not talked about because we focus so much on programming and so many schools do Python, so Python programming, but there’s a whole other area of the curriculum out there.

It’s not just about that. So what makes a good trainee? What was I looking for? Someone who is Resilient, willing to give it a go, willing to learn and anyone that was willing to do a subject knowledge enhancement course to get their subject knowledge up to date, in terms of what is taught on the GCSE and A level specs was my main concern, rather than them having a specific degree, because it’s too difficult to map them all to the curriculum.

Alan: Yeah, no I tend to agree, and I speak as a holder of a computer science degree from 1989, nowadays there’s information systems and software engineering and games design degrees and all of these and they go way off piste compared to what’s on the GCSE.

So you’re probably right. I also said in my podcast episode with Andy Colley, he said he suggested computer science graduates are not always the best teachers. They are a certain type of people. And I knew what he was hinting at. And I said, yeah, I, to be fair, I didn’t hang around with computer science undergraduates. When I was at university, I hung around with archaeologists and English students and more interesting people than the geeks who spent all that. No, it’s true. There were lots of geeks on my course who were not particularly fun to hang around with. So yeah, I totally, yeah, I always say, if someone’s keen and that’s half the battle, isn’t it? If they have an interest in the subject, that’s really what you want. And having a different degree and, but also having some computing aptitude, could be a nice combination. 

Rachel: Yeah don’t get me wrong, subject knowledge is important. You’ve got to have a strong subject knowledge to be able to teach our subjects and I’m not devaluing any training route in terms of, you don’t need to have a degree to do it.

It’s definitely a nice to have, but I do think so many people are self taught in programming and all areas of computer science. Now, lots of people that have done our course this year have taught themselves to program during lockdown. And it was something that they picked up and started to do then. 

Yeah, but that all, so we’ve got someone who used to be an artist and has moved. to becoming a computing teacher, all the way through to people with really specific, really technical degrees in robotics or, networks. So there’s a whole array of people, and that makes it fun to design a course to meet everyone’s needs, but, we’re good at differentiating.

Alan: Talking of which, so breaking news, I haven’t told anybody this but, I am going to be delivering the SKE, the subject knowledge enhancement for Edge Hill after Easter, so that’ll be fun. So if trainees don’t have a computing degree then do you run a subject knowledge enhancement for them?

Rachel: Yeah, we actually wrote our own. So that was a really exciting project to take on a couple of years ago. So Daljit and Johnny and my team and myself wrote it together. So it meant that we could adapt it to make sure that it covered the breadth of the subject knowledge content that we wanted. But obviously. Trainees can do any Subject Knowledge Enhancement course. You can’t say that they’ve got to do yours, you just say that you’re doing a Subject Knowledge Enhancement course. So we get trainees from other universities coming to do ours and then you get, one of our trainees might work with you, Alan, and do yours and come to us after it and that’s absolutely fine.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

It means that non specialists or people who haven’t done a degree that’s where we say yes you need to do a subject knowledge enhancement course or you don’t and often we find those with a computing degree still need to do the subject knowledge enhancement course because of the lack of relevance to the computing curriculum. It’s really good to have people like you delivering them because it’s great to have some good subject knowledge experts delivering those courses because they’re long and there’s a lot of content to cover.

So yeah, 

Alan: there is a lot. Yeah. No I’m looking forward to it because one of the things I really enjoyed when I was head of department was the mentoring of computing trainees. And that’s one of the reasons why, I wanted to get involved in the teacher training. So the mentoring. I had some brilliant, trainees that, they were all brilliant in their own way, but some of them needed a lot more support than others. Um, It’s it was one of the most rewarding things to see a teacher develop. And then fly solo and. Yeah, it was great fun. It must be rewarding to be in that business all the time? 

Rachel: Yeah It’s a delight to watch someone go from the nerves of teaching their first ever lesson that they do in the summer with us all the way through to, loads of our trainees after their first year go on to become heads of department or go into leadership.

So to see them all flourishing and flying It’s lovely, but also to see their confidence grow just in terms of trainees that had never used Python before going to fully teach a GCSE class and seeing the success that their pupils then have because of having that teacher is brilliant. 

Alan: Yeah, that’s the thing.

Yeah, I feel it’s weird. I feel kind of responsible for the mess that the world is in because of technology, because I was obviously a computer scientist. No, partly responsible. I mean, It’s not all my fault, not all of it. 

Rachel: Alan, that’s a lot to take on your shoulders. Yeah. 

Alan: Yeah, it’s my fault guys. It’s my generation of computer scientists and who created, all the problems. So I feel like it’s partly my responsibility To nurture the next generation to solve all of the world’s problems that have been caused by technology. So I used to go into, I would go around and sell the subject and I would beg the head of maths to let me go into maths lessons and science lessons to, Before options evening to sell the subject and I would do a 10 minute, I would do a 10 minute speech and I would finish, thank you for coming to my TED talk, I would do like a 10 minute TED talk on what computing was and I would say, I would literally say to them, you need to solve all the problems that my generation have caused with technology, it’s on you, no pressure. 

Rachel: That’s the joy of the subjects, isn’t it? That they do have those opportunities to go. Yeah. Problem solving, and I think the impact that having a trainee in school, schools often worry and say, oh, we shouldn’t, should we take on a trainee teacher? It’s a lot of responsibility, but the results that those trainees get and the enthusiasm and time and effort and energy that they put into their classes, honestly, every single trainee I’ve worked with, I’ve never, I’ve never seen.

It, It might not always be perfect, but they do, I’ve never seen anyone work as hard. So it was, no, 

Alan: I can say this now with absolute certainty, it was always a net benefit to my department having a trainee or two, which we had once we had two at the same time. Honestly the value they bring is far greater than the cost to me as a mentor or a head of department.

And I would sit at the back of the class and I would make notes and observe, but I’d also be getting on with other stuff like I might probably not marking because that would need more brain power. But I never marked anything anyway. You’ll have heard me talking to Andy Colley a couple of weeks ago where, I just did multiple choice quizzes all the time.

And hey, I got away with it. But, I’d be sat at the back of the class observing my trainee while getting on with other stuff. And And they would help in every way they could. They ran after school clubs for me and all sorts and they loved doing it. So yeah, some of them have been a challenge, but it was a challenge that I always enjoyed.

Rachel: Yeah, and I think there’s a big shout out to all the in school mentors because they are the ones that spend every day with our trainees, with all trainees in school, and they have the biggest impact, like my mentor Sayeed. If he listens to this, that would be amazing, but he completely made my training year.

I don’t know what I would have done without him. He was, he’s an incredible computer science teacher and he held my hand, he wiped my tears, he made me more cups of tea than you can imagine, but he was a fantastic mentor. And I wouldn’t be the teacher I am today. I still think of things that he taught me and things that he said and displays that I never had as good displays as I did when I was a trainee.

Alan: Well, that’s, That’s true. Yeah, you could get them to do that stuff. I know. Yeah, it was always very planning lessons as well and creating resources and creating quizzes. So like I say, I relied heavily on multiple choice quizzes, but I think they’re incredibly valuable if you do a decent multiple choice quiz.

And so I, my trainees would love making, quiz questions and past paper type questions and stuff all the time. So that was great. Yeah no, it was Really good, a lot of my trainees have gone on to get jobs as computing teachers, which is great because there’s hardly any of us!

Rachel: When I’ve the mentor trainees in school as well. I’ve definitely seen that. They, sometimes I’ll go and watch them teach one of my lessons, like you’re saying, sat in the back of the class, and I’ve thought they’ve explained that so much better than I ever would have, and then I find myself stealing their resources or their ideas. It’s definitely made me step up as a teacher. 

Alan: The other thing is, because like I say to the kids, I’m 103, and, I do, actually that’s no word of a lie and I really should stop doing that, but I used to say that a lot and the kids in year seven would go, really? They’re all whispering to each other, he’s 103, and I shouldn’t really tease 11 year olds like that, but I did used to say that, you know me, I’m 103, My point being I’m 50 something and, I’m trying to be down with the kids, but I’m never going to really be, I’m not going to be legit like some of the younger trainees are, you know, my lessons are never going to be described as sick, no matter how hard I try.

Rachel: Those multiple choice quizzes sound excellent, I’m sure. 

Alan: I’m sure they they did enjoy. I discussed this actually on an earlier podcast about going off at a tangent and just going off on stories, which kind of became the theme of the podcast anyway. But, and so they knew how to get me off on a tangent all the time.

And they’d say, tell us more about the robot apocalypse, which was of course my favorite subject. So I used to, I used to say to kids when I was doing my options evening speech, I would say, you, you need to, Take computer science because we need more humans on the side of of humanity in the robot apocalypse and all of that. So, And so they would say, you know, tell me about the laws of robotics, sorry, 

Rachel: with AI, it feels like we’re getting closer to this robot apocalypse than ever before. 

Alan: What was I saying? So I was down at the Oxford Leadership Conference. And I was at dinner the night before with, Jane Waite and others. I’m dropping names now. And we were talking about AI and whether AI will become sentient and, and whether AIs will need rights and will need to consider the rights of robots, basically. And Jane was incredibly skeptical and I still stand by it. I think we’re going to have to, I don’t think there’s anything unique about humans that can’t be replicated in machines, but maybe that’s the computer scientists in me.

So at some point we’ll have to grapple with the rights of robots and stuff like Isaac Asimov predicted. Do you think? 

Rachel: This is a big, it’s a big question. I think Jane Have I got you off 

Alan: your favourite topic? Have I thrown a curveball at you, Rachel? 

Rachel: No, I’m here for it. Jane is the, an expert in the research on it, so I would never go against anything. Jane’s literature review, if you look, if you’re looking at AI computing, the literature review that she has done, and the work that Ben’s done at Raspberry Pi on AI is excellent, so they would be my go tos on that. But I think, will we ever have to have rights for robots? I don’t know, because I think everything is, anything that you program is, Like a version of reality rather than someone actually having thoughts, feelings and experiences themselves. So would a robot ever have feelings? Probably not. And emotions, but can it replicate them really well? Yes. Yeah. I don’t know, but it’s becoming very iRobot, isn’t it? And I’ve seen how those films end. And I 

Alan: love this. I don’t think there’s any right answer. And yes, I totally agree. Jane Waits done some fantastic research and, and is very knowledgeable about this subject. But I think the topic of robot rights is more philosophy than computer science. 

Rachel: Yeah, 

Alan: I speak as someone who read a load of sci fi as a kid. So I’m come from Isaac Asimov’s three laws of robotics and stuff like that. But I have to say your response there, Rachel, was. Absolutely what a deepfake would say, so you know.

Rachel: Well, So 

Alan: I don’t think you’re, I don’t think you’re real at all. 

Rachel: I always say please and thank you to Siri just in case because I am scared about what might happen in the future and at least if I’m polite to the robots in my life. Then I might have some favour in the future. So 

Alan: that’s my friend of mine said uh, uh, my friend of mine who said, I’ll have to go around and help me mum with Alexa the other day because she couldn’t get it to do anything.

And she said mom, just say what you said to Alexa and I’ll work out what’s going wrong. And she said, All I said was, Hey Alexa, can you put radio two on? There’s a love, you know, and she didn’t like mum. You just have to just say fewer words, you know? yeah. They’re not quite, not quite human yet. No. 

Rachel: Well, Maybe, you know, we’re definitely going that way, and I know with regional accents, Alexa really struggled with regional accents to start with, but it is got a lot better, so we’ll see.

Yeah. As 

Alan: you’ve probably heard, I’ve had um, Snoop Dogg, Mr. Beast and Joe Biden on my podcast so far. . 

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!

Rachel: Yeah. 

Well, 

Alan: um, I mean, It’s amazing how many celebrities wanna be on this podcast. I’ll probably get Taylor Swift on next week. 

Rachel: I feel honored. I feel honored to be here. 

Alan: Deepfake rachel Arthur on my on my podcast.

Um, Yeah. Um. Right, I know, yeah, this week’s gone a bit surreal. Um, yeah, we did. Why teach computing? Oh, we didn’t really. One of the things I’ll splice this bit in to the earlier conversation, if it makes more sense there, because I can do that with Descript, only 24 a month. I was on, actually, this afternoon, Rachel, the CAS Innovation Panel.

Rachel: Yes! 

Alan: And I know that you were obviously parenting at that time. 

Rachel: Yes, I was trying to attend but my very small baby had other ideas. 

Alan: So talking of dropping names, I was hobnobbing with Paul Curzon and Miles Berry and Simon Humphreys and Catherine Elliott and Sue Sentance and Carrie Anne. And um, oh it was lovely. And we were talking about, Why teach computing, and first thing I said was equity, because that’s me, and I said that it was the digital haves and have nots are actually becoming the can’s and can nots. People who know how to use technology and those that don’t, and that’s becoming a big problem, don’t you think?

Rachel: Yeah, and I think the digital divide is only getting worse, especially with AI that we’ve already talked about, but if we don’t have great teachers teaching computing, there is not access to computing in that school. That means that the pupils in that area can’t do GCSE computer science and what we’re seeing when I’ve been doing some research into why girls choose computer science or why they don’t and often it’s not offered is the first barrier.

So if it’s not offered in school, then it’s not an option for them, male or female. So that’s why it’s so important to teach it. 

Alan: And then those that offer it, gatekeep it 

Rachel: from 

Alan: the low prior attaining students, for example, or they gatekeep it from SEND students, which, My experience shows that, there’s no reason why anybody can’t do computer science .

Rachel: it’s an absolute frustration of mine when someone says, only pupils who’ve got this grade in maths or only high prior attaining students can do computer science, there’s a reason that there’s grades one to nine because any of those grades is an achievement in that subject.

It really, really, really is about access to a subject to inspire the next generation to go on to want to study it further. I’m really frustrated when I see schools putting barriers in place as to which pupils can choose it. I’d love to see more schools offering it and then no barriers in terms of who can take it and really considering where it’s been put in the option blocks as well, because it is an EBacc subject, when it’s being put against, the other bucket, then pupils are less likely to choose it and teachers discourage them from choosing it because it’s an EBacc subject.

So it doesn’t fill those buckets for Progress 8. Yeah, and they say 

Alan: things like, oh, you should be doing triple science, never mind computing. And, yeah, no, it is a tricky one. I think we’re on the same page on that and we want as many young people as possible, preferably all of them, to do some kind of computing qualification, computer science preferably, but we were talking this afternoon about whether the new government will have a look at this and whether we’ll end up with a computing or applied computing GCSE again.

Do you think that’s a good idea? 

Rachel: I think. It is an excellent idea because we need to have a balance computer science as a GCSE is trying to cover so much content within it. We know all the computer science teachers listen to this. It’s trying to be all things to all people and actually having, a computer science like technical GCSE, and then a more applied digital skills for people that are going to be using technology in their everyday lives, which we all are going to be in our jobs of the future, is really exciting.

Almost like a basic right that every people should be leaving school with. It should be alongside literacy, numeracy, and digital skills. So whether or not it needs to be GCSE, I don’t know. We can, there’s lots of different ways that you can do it, but it needs to be taught. as a right to our pupils to be able to use a computer properly.

Alan: I think it’s really important and one of the things that struck me when I was talking this afternoon was about, digital citizenship as a bare minimum needs to be taught and that’s, being able to participate in society as it becomes increasingly computerized and advocating for yourself in a computerized world from a place of knowledge and what immediately sprung to mind was the post office horizon scandal and all those victims of miscarriage of justice who had no means of defending themselves against evidence that They had defrauded, the post office because they and their lawyers didn’t have enough digital literacy to challenge the charges.

Rachel: It’s even, just the basics. Online banking, paying your bills, so the basics that people do on a day to day basis. Fake news, it’s not just a case of educating people about, you say digital skills and it, and people’s mind goes to, oh, we’ll do a touch typing course. That’s not what I mean, that it’s about, it’s almost something that falls between English and media and Religious studies even, it’s a worldwide awareness of all the challenges that are brought to us by social media and by having access to the internet in our pockets all the time. And all the fake news that is out there, and how to, you can’t move for being on Twitter or X and seeing fake stories about Kate Middleton at the moment, and I feel like 

Alan: there’s a 

Rachel: lot of false things 

Alan: going on. Yeah, 

Rachel: no it is. Our kids have been exposed to all of this all of the time, how do we protect them and look after them?

And, there’s the whole education for a connected world framework, but how well is that taught across schools and where do people fit in the curriculum? Yeah, 

Alan: it’s a great framework, but again, the education for a connected world is brilliant, but it’s massive. Yeah, huge. It’s huge, and in case listeners don’t know, Project Evolve is there from Southwest Grid for Learning to cover the whole of the education for a connected world framework.

It’s all there if you want to teach online safety very well in your school, but no school has the time for all of that, so. but we need to make the time somehow, but that’s, government and DfE need to do something about that. And I think we do need a refresh of the national curriculum and foreground some more digital literacy skills.

Rachel: If you want it to be taught, if you want anything to be taught in a school, you’ve got to make it someone’s responsibility, and there’s got to be. Points awarded, or achievement awarded, or something awarded for a school to take that seriously. Results, unfortunately, are the money that we work in as schools. It’s not on the curriculum, if it’s not on an exam board spec, then it’s not gonna be. 

Alan: Yeah, 

Rachel: In a curriculum, sadly 

Alan: true. That’s the way it is at the moment. So hopefully we will get an applied computing type qualification. I did hear what you said there about, it’s not touch typing.

I think a lot of schools try to put pupils on a vocational IT alternative because it’s easier. And I’ve taught CIDA, I’ve taught. Cambridge Nationals IT. I’ve taught creative iMedia and they’re all very hard and full of writing, which means they’re not actually particularly suitable for pupils that we believe are going to struggle with computer science.

There’s no easier. There’s quite a lot of literacy involved for a start, so it does annoy me that it. ICT or even computing is still seen as ICT and is still seen as some kind of vocational, 

Rachel: and the screenshot qualifications, as I call them, where you end up with reams and for those that haven’t taught them, you end up with reams and reams of screenshots of evidence from pupils.

Yeah. They’re not actually. Oh, I’ve done 

Alan: some research on software. No, you’ve just googled stuff and screenshotted it and written it as if it’s your own. Yeah. Oh, I found some soft. No, you didn’t. I said I was, this is the software I gave you to use for this product. And you just went and pretended to do some research.

Yeah. Mad qualifications. They were. And 

Advertisements

Rachel: ECDL or don’t even go there. 

Alan: We have rambled. Well, I say we, Rachel and I spoke for 10 minutes and then I’ve been talking to deepfake Rachel for 50. Um, So that’s been brilliant. What does the future hold for? Teacher training. Is there some changes coming?

Are they rationalizing ITT and ECF or something? Did I read? 

Rachel: Yeah, there’s loads of changes coming. There’s a whole, there’s always change. When isn’t there change, Alan? It’s just the world that we live in. There’s something called the ITAP, which is coming into place. And we’re all preparing for that, which is about really high quality.

The initial stage of teacher training, so for us it’s our institute so how we can make sure that’s as robust in terms of pedagogy and classroom interactions as possible. But I’m really excited about what technology can bring to initial teacher training and, been doing some research and speaking to lots of different people about how we can use AI for initial teacher training.

And I’m a big fan of deliberate practice and, giving trainees as many opportunities as possible to practice their skills. Cause I think that’s the only real way to become an excellent teacher, but often for our trainees because they’re teaching in the school. That they’re employed at and they’re there permanently.

If you make a mistake with the class, as we all know, there’s not much going back. You can’t zap their memories and pretend that didn’t happen, or pause and say, can we go again? So I’d be really interested in simulated learning environments and how AI could behave like a classroom that I don’t know, I’m imagining kind of VR headsets and a simulated classroom environment so trainees can practice different scenarios before going into the real real world.

Real classroom setting because it shouldn’t be a practice run because it’s those kids education, so we need to make sure that it’s they’re in the best place possible to do that. I think there’s some exciting changes coming. And in terms of computing teacher training, like we’ve just been talking about, the digital qualifications, how we’d have to adapt subject knowledge and the subject knowledge parts of our program to be able to teach a different suite of qualifications if we’re There’s reform to the computing, GCSE.

So that will be, really fun when I’ve just finished writing my curriculum. 

Alan: Good. 

So, 

Rachel: yeah,

Alan: Yeah, so all you need to do is do what you did last time and just get ChatGPT to write your curriculum again, Rachel, you know. if I, 

Rachel: if ChatGPT could do, So if you could do that for me and that would be brilliant, but unfortunately, I think we’re a while off it being able to personalize it in the way that we want it to and it being reliable enough, but I don’t think we’re that far off it.

Alan: Now, um, just for the listeners benefit. Don’t actually believe that Rachel used AI to write the teach first curriculum, but just in case the lawyers are listening, the number of spelling 

Rachel: mistakes in my curriculum would say that I definitely wrote it. 

Alan: Oh no, you can say, ChatGPT, please write like a bad speller an initial teacher training computing curriculum.

You could say that and get lots of spelling mistakes in it and make, make it look like a human wrote it. 

Rachel: I am deepfake Rachel, so I wouldn’t want to Well, yeah, 

Alan: that’s right, yeah. Good, brilliant. I think I’m looking off to the side here because I’ve got loads of notes, like I plan these things are scripted, yes, Alan, they are scripted. Yeah, Yeah, 

Rachel: it’s scripted. The robot has completed her script for the day. 

Alan: Thank you. Right, um, that was brilliant. I have no idea how I’m going to edit that down to a reasonable length. 

Rachel: Good luck! But 

Alan: this is, This is what I do. I just get, Because I have such great guests on and we end up talking forever, we end up talking for over an hour and then I don’t know what to do and I end up leaving most of it in.

Rachel: It’s hard isn’t it, but you’ve got your great software so hopefully that will help. 

Alan: My great software, Descript, only 24 a month for the pro version and I just press a button and it gets rid of all the ums and ahs and stuff, although it’s, you’ve got to be careful because. When I interviewed Andy Colley, he has a phrase which is, you got to keep the main thing, the main thing, which is great, but it cuts out repetition of the main thing.

I spotted it before the podcast went out, so I was all right, but yeah. The AI looks for repeated phrases. And the AI looks for repeated phrases and takes them out. Will it take out 

Rachel: that repetition? We’ll see. 

Alan: It might do, and then this will make no sense to the listeners, this bit that we’re talking about afterwards.

It’s really, it’s a bit like Inception, this. None of it’s making sense. 

Rachel: Nothing’s real. What is real anymore? No. We’re all in the 

Alan: matrix, and maybe I’m a deepfake. Oh, well that would just be the 

Rachel: twist, wouldn’t it? To finish this episode. 

Alan: It’s just really happening. What’s this ready for? Right, um, On that note.

I think I’d probably better, what shall I say, terminate the program. This is where you go, no, I’ve got rights. 

Rachel: Yeah. Do I get shut down now? Is that what happens? 

Alan: Yeah. Sorry. Yeah. Cause you’re not real and you don’t have any rights. 

Rachel: Send me for some updates. Yeah. And 

Alan: when you’ve been glitching, you’ve been glitching a bit.

Rachel: After my maternity leave, I can return with a, you know, new, restored version. 

Alan: Yeah. Right on that note. I think it’s been brilliant. I hope that we met the brief, which I think was, how do I train to teach computing? Something like that. 

Rachel: Pick one of the training programs. But the main message is just do it please just train to become a 

Alan: computer student.

How hard can it be? 

Rachel: We can do it. 

Alan: We can do it and we’re not even real. So how hard can it be if you’re an actual human? No, it’s a 

Rachel: brilliant, joyful career and there’s lots of Lots and lots of opportunities that come from it, so would thoroughly recommend. So yeah, thanks for having me. It’s been a joy.

Alan: Yeah, no, it’s been great to talk to you and thanks for coming on. I will I haven’t heard anything, so I guess in the background. 

Rachel: Yeah, your little 

Alan: ones are still asleep. 

Rachel: Yeah, two out of two. 

Alan: Good, so you might even get an hour of telly. 

Rachel: Treat myself, there’s a, I’ve gone back to watching Grey’s Anatomy from the start, so 

Alan: that’s why.

From the start? 

Rachel: Yeah. 

Alan: Oh, good. Not actually done that one, but my wife’s, what’s, where is it that she’s watched, Friends about ten times, but have you seen that new girl with, Zoe Deschanel or something. Yeah, she’s watched that about three times. 

Rachel: Yeah, 

Alan: I don’t mind. That’s quite funny. 

Rachel: Yeah, so light hearted 

Alan: good so I will let you go and have some precious quiet time.

Rachel: Thank you, I don’t know the 

Alan: robots need quiet time. 

Rachel: We need to, refresh overnight and install updates and reboot and restart. 

Alan: All right, okay, lovely to talk to you, Rachel. 

Rachel: Thank you, thanks for having me. Take care, bye.

Alan: So that was a fun episode to make hope you enjoyed it. Let’s revisit our fertile question. How hard can it be? Have we answered it. Let me know in the comments or on the socials, this has been how to teach computer science, the podcast. I’m Alan Harrison, please do visit my website. I’m not being paid for this. 

So buy my books or buy me a coffee, please details at HTTCS.ONLINE. And subscribe now. So you don’t miss a thing. Have a great weekend and I’ll catch you next week.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!
Categories
computing general HTTCS leadership teaching and learning Uncategorized

Leading Secondary Computing

This is a blog I wrote for the NCCE where I work as the Secondary Computing Leadership Specialist PDL. It will appear on the NCCE blog here shortly.

If they remember nothing else, I’m sure my former pupils will recall my rallying cry for the Computer Science GCSE when their options choices came around: “we need good computer scientists like you on the side of the humans when the robot apocalypse comes!” I would declare, only half-joking. It worked, too, in my five years as HoD at an inner-city school I saw option numbers climb to record levels. I even achieved a 30% female cohort, through a range of efforts from ensuring representation in displays and resources, making the learning relevant, and a relentless “whisper campaign” of praise and encouragement: countering girls’ tendency to underestimate their ability and feel they don’t “belong”  in computer science (see here). (Thrillingly, all the girls in that cohort achieved GCSE grade 6 or above, so the moral is: if you want good results, encourage more girls!) I also picked up a confused and disjointed curriculum, and set about re-engineering it, replacing my schemes of work, over a couple of years, with the Teach Computing Curriculum (TCC). I was able to trust the research-informed progression framework that underpins the TCC and cite this in my curriculum documentation – the ubiquitous Intent, Implementation and Impact docs we all wrote for the new Ofsted regime!

Today the TCC contains nearly 300 lessons in over 40 units for KS3 and 4, so there really is a TCC unit for every need, and there are now “Secondary question banks” for assessment, available as Google Forms and Microsoft Forms which you can just duplicate and use as your own, editing as necessary. I’m a big fan of good quality Multiple Choice Quizzes (MCQs), as they can take a lot of strain out of retrieval practice, and formative and summative assessment. Combined with some longer – but less frequent – written assessment you can get a good handle on progress without too much traditional marking. There are thousands more questions available for free at diagnosticquestions.com/quantum, and I’m also a seasoned user of SmartRevise from Craig’n’Dave, which offers longer-form exam-style questions with self- and AI-marking features.

Teaching A-level, I found Isaac Computer Science came in really handy. What I needed was a “MOOC” or online source of accurate, exam-board-specific content I could just point the students at for self-study and revision. Now expanded to cover GCSE content, IsaacComputerScience.org does just that. It also contains many hundreds of practice questions which can be organised into “gameboards”. I would create a gameboard every week on the topic we were studying, and use the results to re-teach the bits on which they performed worst. I’ve no doubt this cycle of self-marking quizzes and re-teaching (along with other deliberate practice techniques, I’m a big fan of Adam Boxer’s concept of “ratio”) helped me to record GCSE and A-level results in recent years. For A-level students, Isaac comes with regular “student booster” events aligned to the content, while Isaac Teacher events have now been merged into the regular Teach Computing course catalogue here.

I completed the Computer Science Accelerator (now called the Subject Knowledge Certificate) a few years back, then the Teach Secondary Computing certificate, and I strongly recommend doing both of these if you are a subject leader, courses are free and subsidised for all state schools and really affordable for private institutions, find out more here. So impressed was I with the NCCE courses, I completed Professional Development Leader training and joined a computing hub as a PDL, and here I am today as your national specialist in Secondary Leadership! The hubs are amazing, I recommend you get in touch with a local hub and find out what they can do for you, including advice, needs analysis, bespoke support and the loan of equipment.

I’ve spoken a lot about pedagogy, it fascinates me, and I really enjoyed the Big Book of Computing Pedagogy, and the follow-up Big Book of Computing Content published by the Raspberry Pi foundation, and these are must-reads for Computing subject leads. Maybe you could organise some CPD for your team around one of the articles? If you’re pressed for time, there are Pedagogy Quick Reads on the NCCE website here, which all helped me switch to PRIMM programming and improve my explanations with Semantic Waves with excellent results.

Finally, all of the above topics will be on the agenda The Big Computing Leadership Conference, on December 14th 2023 at Oxford Brookes University. Myself and Primary Computing Leadership Specialist, Phil Wickins, are joined by a star-studded cast of speakers and exhibitors. It’s your one-stop shop for all things a computing leader might need. You will also get trained in the Computing Quality Framework for free on the day, enabling you to go back and take immediate action to develop your department.

For more information about the specialist hub and how to get in touch see our website here, while the agenda for the Big Conference and how to book are here. See you on 14th December, but only if you want to be on the side of humans in the coming robot apocalypse!

Best wishes,

Alan Harrison.

Categories
#LEARN computing HTTCS leadership teaching and learning

HTTCS @ LGfL

UPDATE: my talk was warmly received, thanks to everyone who came to my stand later to talk to me, it was a fantastic day.

The content (actually a 12-inch remix version of my talk*) can now be found below. Also in the attached is a discount code for 30% off my books this summer at John Catt bookshop – read the embedded PDF below to find it!

*for the younger generation, a 12-inch vinyl single was an extended recording of the track, often up to 3 times longer than the 7-inch single.

I am delighted to be speaking and exhibiting at the LGfL “Let’s Celebrate II” conference in London on Friday 30th June 2023. I’ll be giving a talk on Powerful Knowledge in Computing, and I’ll also have a stand in the exhibition area where you can buy my books and lovely new merchandise:

For more information about the conference and how to book, click the LGFL banner image below:

I’ll be speaking on the topic below. Hope to see you there!

A Knowledge-Rich Computing Curriculum (that also pleases Ofsted!) – Alan Harrison alan@httcs.online

What is powerful knowledge in Computing? What are declarative and procedural knowledge anyway? How do I squeeze computing into my packed Primary curriculum? What must I deliver at KS4 for those that don’t take Computer Science GCSE? Alan wrote the book “How to Teach Computer Science” and is passionate about powerful knowledge in the important academic discipline of computing. Alan also served on the working group that created the Ofsted Research Review and has interviewed successful Deep Dive recipients. Attend this talk to be enthused by powerful Computing knowledge and also get some actionable tips to be relaxed about OFSTED’s next visit.

Categories
computing leadership programming teaching and learning

Don’t Panic! On that paper and what it means…

The furore about this year’s OCR GCSE Computer Science Paper 2 (J277/02) brings into stark relief the gulf between where we are as a subject, and where we need to be, in terms of capability. It’s a time for reflection, not for panic. The responsibility for thoughtful reflection falls on the computing subject leaders.

Subject Leaders (SLs) are the engine-room of the school. Sometimes called curriculum leaders or heads of department, as such these engine-rooms should be given largely unlimited fuel (training, resources and support) and clear guidance (achievable goals and strategic direction) to ensure their success. Often this is lacking, and computing SLs regularly report feeling under-supported: that their subject is poorly understood and under-resourced. Exam results should drive a discussion between the SL and strategic/senior leadership team (SLT) and it’s right that this should ask non-threatening questions of the SL about their department’s capability: do they have the resources, training and support to achieve the best outcomes possible for their students?

Unfortunately, these conversations are not always positive, causing SLs to fear for their careers instead of being able to work together with SLT on the advancement of their subject outcomes. This has never been so clear as in the panic over Thursday’s paper. I hope in this blog to bring some clarity to the situation. I have left out names, and avoided criticising individuals. But to be clear before we start, I think some teachers have gone too far in their response to what was a tough but fair paper, and I give alternative views and a series of actionable recommendations below.

Screenshot from Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy TV series, showing the words "Don't Panic" over a fading image of the Vogon ship arriving in Earth orbit.

The harsh reality is that the complaints about the paper that inundated Facebook from Thursday evening onwards say more about our ability as a teaching body to prepare our learners for a robust assessment, than they do about the quality or fairness of the exam itself. My unpopular opinion is that the exam was tough but largely fair. Nothing was assessed that wasn’t in the specification, and it seems many teachers have been over-reliant on the practice paper and past papers on OCR’s website and secure “Interchange” area, perhaps leaning on these to guide their curriculum rather too much, instead of trying to cover the whole specification. [Edit: this paragraph previously used the phrase “been caught out teaching to the test” and I have removed and rewritten to be clearer and sound less judgemental].

An over-reliance on questions from the previous specification (J276) would not have helped. That specification was designed to run with a practical programming project worth 20% therefore paper 2 looked somewhat different, without the in-depth scenario-based “Section B”. Each programming question on J276 was fairly short and self-contained, so didn’t demand a great deal of computational thinking. Add to this the COVID-adjustments to boundaries last year, against the first run of J277, and some schools may have gained false confidence in their performance.

Let’s look at some of the specific complaints from the social feeds, and I’ll try to refute them with evidence from the exam board as necessary. I’ve taken comments from the J277 and older OCR Comp Sci group (which I call the J276 group below).

What was said on the socials…

I can’t agree with these comments:

  • “Bring back teacher assessed grades” and “I strongly believe teacher assessed grades should be implemented after this tragedy” – please, just no. Read this.
  • “I’m going to email my kids tomorrow to let them know we all feel the same about the paper” and “Please encourage pupils and their parents to write/complain to OCR and other bodies such as OFQUAL etc. Do everything you can!” Please don’t. This will increase anxiety and be counter-productive, and possibly bring your school or the exam board into disrepute, so I’d advise against this.
  • “People creating these papers need to show their face and take responsibility. The paper today seriously undermines teachers across the nation of this difficult subject, and can’t imagine what pupils are going through right now. If we don’t make noise, students in the future will continue experience days like this.” OCR have a feedback form, an appeals process and a helpful subject advisor, I strongly urge you to use the appropriate channels and take guidance from your exams officer or SLT before taking any other action.
  • “most of us are 1 person subjects and the consequences from this are we have to explain ourselves to SLT and it makes us question our own ability. Almost feels like they want this subject to fail.” The correct response from SLT to any 1-person departments struggling to get good results in this subject would be to support you with CPD or recruitment. I’m aware this is difficult in the current climate, but all subject leaders have a responsibility to communicate upwards effectively about their department’s strengths and weaknesses. It goes with the territory, although I’ve been there and I know how hard it is. I give lots of actionable advice below.
  • “loopy loop question driving me loopy let alone my poor EAL students!” – I thought the wording of 3b was about as clear as it could be, while still asking an important question that reveals whether the candidate understands the two types of loops in the context of a sorting algorithm. I talk more about this below. As for EAL, some students are allowed translation dictionaries under specific rules, but it is an English exam board GCSE.
  • “It certainly wasn’t written by a teacher, as good teachers know how to relay computing concepts to students with a range of abilities.” – I think there were a lot of AO1 marks in Section A that are “easy” if the content has been taught well, retrieved often and revised well. Differences between HLL/LLL, arithmetic operators, define syntax and logic errors, spot the truth tables, describe features of an IDE to name a few. There is enough there to be accessible by those with mock/predicted grades of 1,2,3,4.

The accessibility of the paper is questioned several times on the Facebook groups. I think it’s worth exploring this some more in the context of the 3b insertion sort question. I put the question into Word and it came out as “Grade 6.7” so roughly UK Year 8 reading level. I think any attempts to dumb down this question would fail, because ironically the first sentence is an important preamble, conveying content rather than asking a question. The extra words are intended to help, not hinder understanding.

The answer “because the inner loop moves the unsorted number leftwards in the array and only stops when the number to its left is smaller than it, which is a condition not a count.” could only be gleaned from this question worded as it is, or similarly to it.

Advertisements

Amusingly I posted the question into ChatGPT followed by the prompt “Please help me reword this exam question to be easier to understand” and the result was as follows:

Why is it necessary for the inner loop in an insertion sort algorithm to be condition-controlled rather than count-controlled?

Note that we’ve lost the preamble, so this version could well be harder for some to answer than the original! We’ve lost the word “loop” after both “condition-controlled” and “count-controlled”, but does this make it easier or harder to understand? Ironically, Word now rates this “Grade 12.9” or Year 13/14 reading level due to the average word-length and sentence-length increase. I think we do examiners a disservice when we jump to conclusions about readability: question writing is not an intuitive skill.

The Logic Gate question was not as heavily scaffolded as last year’s question. But it was fair. Students need to understand that a boolean value often represents a fact about the world, such as whether it is day or night. It is reasonable to expect them to work out the logic circuit for an alarm system. I always teach logic circuits with real-world examples, because it says in the specification, “Understanding of how to create, complete or edit logic diagrams and truth tables for given scenarios”, and there was even a scenario question on Practice Set 2 Paper 2: “A cinema uses the following criteria to decide if a customer is allowed to see a film that has a 15 rating…”

Indeed, one of the most popular commercial resource bundles for our subject, that from Paul Long includes an exercise that is almost identical to last Thursday’s exam question, and the helpful advice “You could be presented with a real-world scenario and asked to create a logic circuit for that scenario”:

Snip from Paul Long "Ultimate GCSE CS Textbook for OCR" showing a worked example of a scenario very similar to the exam question under discussion.
Valid criticisms

I do consider these valid complaints about the paper:

  • Page 13 uses “alarm has been activated” when it should say “system has been armed” to match the variable name above “SystemArmed”, and to better describe the condition of being armed. Activation should only refer to the triggering of a sensor, otherwise the candidates will be confused. So the sentence below the bulleted variable list should begin “The alarm will only sound when the system has been armed…”
  • There is an error in the identifier of the array on page 17, this should have said arrayEvents[1, 1] not events[1, 1]
  • Printing the array on a right-hand page, with the algorithm writing space on its reverse caused unnecessary back-and-forth. Papers are usually designed to avoid this but not in this case.

The complaints about “Do Until” in question 1d are misguided. Both switch/case and do-until are in the specification, and switch/case was even on the 2022 paper. The Examiners’ Report (available on Interchange since last September) says this: “Candidates appeared to struggle with this question. In particular the use of switch/case was not well understood. This may be because some high-level languages such as Python have not traditionally supported this.” It’s important to teach the whole specification, and remember this is not a Python exam.

Practical programming with Python, C#, Javascript or whatever language(s) you choose is vitally important, but you must cover all of the concepts in the spec. As the examiners’ report says, Python 3.10 supports switch/case with the new match and case keywords explained here, and you can Fork my REPL here replit.com/@mraharrison/match-case. If you are still using IDLE, Thonny or another local install, you’ll need to get this upgraded to Python 3.10 to use it, or you could jump online to the excellent replit.com instead. For do-until you could show them the Do Until Loop statements in Visual Basic Macros inside Excel like this, or maybe the JavaScript do-while construct, which you can try out here.

So the subject leaders need to know the specification inside out, read the examiners comments, attend OCR training and generally be experts in what the qualification is testing. As well as this, all teachers of the subject must have clear guidance on what to teach, be supported with quality materials, and most importantly, be provided with quality CPD so they can improve their subject knowledge. I’ve written before about the need for computing teachers to upskill themselves, so they can teach the subject better. In my June 2021 blog post, I said this:

Once you know it yourself, and feel confident you know it, you can explain the material in ways others understand. Rather than asking for slides and worksheets, I recommend teaching yourself the content. Then study others explaining it well.

Never Mind the Powerpoint“, June 2021, this blog.
Next steps for subject leaders

If you are a subject leader of computing…

  1. Don’t add fuel to the fire. You have a duty of care to remain calm, supportive and professional. Help your students by not exaggerating the issue and don’t encourage them to complain.
  2. Don’t assume we are all of the same opinion. As a subject body, opinions are at best divided on the quality and fairness of J277/02 2023. We are not universally outraged, perhaps step out of the “Facebook filter bubble” and see other opinions. I have made the case above that it is hard but fair, and many others share my opinion.
  3. Thoughtfully consider how you feel about both papers (and remember there was no great panic over paper 1) and give your feedback to OCR via the feedback form.
  4. Discuss with your exams officer what happened, and get a meeting with your SLT link this summer to start conversations about closing any gaps in you delivery, what help do you need?
  5. Request copies of completed scripts in August, with permission from the students, of the top, middle and bottom of your cohort. Read these alongside the examiners report, that comes out in early September. Use this to identify gaps in your delivery that may need closing with CPD, resources or curriculum changes.
  6. Use the NCCE and CAS and the free resources available online to upskill yourself and other teachers in the department. For example “switch/case” and “do/until” are explained in this Craig’n’Dave video. Book you and your department onto some subject-specific CPD, and buy books you can use to upskill (and yes I wrote one that is well-regarded, see the home page).
  7. Think broader than KS4, are results this year likely to be poor because of insufficient curriculum time at KS3, or non-specialist provision? Write those things on your subject improvement plan. We cannot be expected to deliver strong results with one hand tied behind our backs.
  8. Complete the Computing Quality Framework questionnaire which identifies the needs of your department. Use this to justify to SLT any support or changes you need: computingqualityframework.org
  9. Read the Ofsted Research Review of computing identify any gaps, and put these on your plan as well. Be honest and professional. (Oh and remember as computing teachers we are like hen’s teeth right now, if your current SLT don’t support you, you have options!
To SLT

Computer Science is an EBacc subject and highly prized by employers and colleges. Ofsted’s recent report (above) makes it clear that they are expecting you to offer the GCSE (and also deliver alternative computing teaching at KS4 for those that don’t take it), and also that a minimum of 1 hour per week at KS3 delivered by a specialist is expected. Please resource your computing department accordingly and be guided by the subject leader in what they need to succeed.

To students

To students reading this: remember you sat two papers, this was a tough paper but your scores will be aggregated, then standardised and grade boundaries will be set that reflect the difficulty of the papers. You have likely done better than you think. Put it behind you and do the best you can when exams resume on Monday. You’ve got this.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!
Categories
leadership tech

Taming the email menace.

We’ve all been there. After form time and tough, back to back Year 9 lessons where your patience was stretched to the limit, you manage a bathroom break, grab a cup of tea, open Outlook and – boom – 36 emails have arrived since you checked just two-and-a-half hours ago…

  1. “Can you check your classroom, Darius has lost his planner again. Also don’t give him a uniform detention for his trainers as he has outgrown his shoes and Mum is buying new ones at the weekend, thanks”
  2. “A reminder about next week’s parents evening, as per my previous email, don’t forget to order a sandwich and tell staff about the new uniform policy, pupil progress data, options available in Y10 and remind behaviour standards – these are non-negotiables.”
  3. “There is a new vacancy for a High Level Teaching Assistant…”
  4. “Celebrating sports success: Year 9 boys football team beat Saint Bart’s 3-1 in the semi last night, if you see Tyrone congratulate him on his hat-trick!”
  5. “Jodi’s PE kit is missing, and it’s got her new Nikes in, mother is frantic, please look in your departments, cheers”
  6. “Has anyone seen Rylan, he walked out of Geography twenty minutes ago to go to the toilet but hasn’t returned?”
  7. “PLEASE READ! Jude has a new reasonable adjustment, please see the SEND spreadsheet asap”
  8. “READ ONLY IF YOU TEACH Y10: Don’t seat Pasha and Ruby together they’ve had a fallout”
  9. “You have been placed on cover for period 5: 8C Drama in DS1”
  10. “Can someone do my duty second half of lunch, Lara’s been sick at school and I need to pick her up asap sorry”
  11. “Reminder: as stated in today’s briefing email, send all Y7s to the Sports Hall period 4 today for their photos”
  12. “Your cover has been cancelled period 5: 8C Drama in DS1”
  13. “IMPORTANT: Has anyone seen Libby’s Rubik’s Cube, it’s her fidget device and helps her concentrate, she thinks she left it in Science yesterday”
  14. “Hi Alan, this is an action from the Heads of Faculty meeting, Ann-Marie says ‘Can everyone update their Curriculum Intent, Impact and Implementation documents asap, we might be getting an Ofsted soon as there is a lot of website traffic – this is urgent and non-negotiable so please do it before close of play tomorrow.’ – so, Alan, as you’re the expert for Computing can you get this updated before lunchtime tomorrow so I can check before the deadline please?”
  15. “Dear Alan, thanks for your interest in the <middle leader role>, your application was welcome but we won’t be selecting you for interview. “
  16. “Last chance to send me your world book day pics! The more unusual setting in which you’re reading a book the better: up a tree, in the bath (keep it clean folks!), anything goes. Email pics to me by the end of the day thanks.”
  17. “Hi Alan I see you gave Rylan a 4 on his behaviour report, can you elaborate on that because he says he’s never had a C1 from you? Was it homework not behaviour?”
  18. “URGENT: Can all staff show this slide to their class this afternoon about next week’s charity bake sale, thanks”
  19. “Hello all. As you know, everyone needs to contribute to the school’s Enrichment programme, so can you reply before the end of the week with the enrichment activity you want to run? There are some suggestions on the staff drive in the Enrichment folder.”
  20. “As a literacy champion, can you please attend a meeting this Thursday at lunchtime, RSVP asap please so I can get this sorted, also I’ll need your Tier 3 vocabulary asap thanks!”
  21. “URGENT: You have not done your mandatory training on FGM, the deadline was last Friday. This has now been escalated to your Line Manager. Please do this today”
  22. “Exam access arrangements: I have updated these after recent assessments, see this spreadsheet for details”
  23. “If anyone in school owns a red Audi MK55 IJK please move it, you’re blocking a resident, thanks.”
  24. “I’ll be popping round today with the ‘This is what an Ally looks like’ rainbow picture frame for our PRIDE day presentation, so please pose for a pic to show our pupils you are an LGBTQ ally, thanks!”
  25. “Re: URGENT: that slide about the bake sale is only for Key Stage 3 please, sorry for the confusion. KS4 are not invited to the bake sale as they are focusing on exams so don’t show to them, thanks”
  26. “Hello Sir, can you send me some past papers please?”
  27. “Geography field trip: updated pupil list – these pupils will be on the trip on Friday…”
  28. “FW: from <exams officer> Here is the draft timetable for the summer exams from AQA let me know any potential issues.”
  29. “Ramadan Mubarak to all our Muslim staff and students!”
  30. “Sorry to email everyone again but Libby’s really upset about her Rubik’s cube, please check everywhere, thanks!”
  31. “Jodi’s PE kit turned up, thanks everyone for looking. Florence had taken it home by mistake again!”
  32. “Re: URGENT mandatory training email. Sorry this was sent to some of you in error, please ignore if you believe you have done the FGM training, with my apologies.”
  33. “It’s me again, Lara’s Dad is picking her up, thanks to everyone who offered to cover my duty but I’m OK now, and you’re all stars mwah!”
  34. “Hello Mr Harrison, this is the parent of Aisha in your Y11 class, she says she got a detention for missed homework but she says she did it, can I have a call today asap as she is very upset.”
  35. “Sorry I didn’t send this earlier but Rylan turned up just after I sent that email, I’ve spoken to him about internal truanting. Thanks to all that went out looking for him in their frees, sorry for the wild goose chase!”
  36. “You have been placed on cover for period 5: 9D Maths in M4”.

It’s good to talk (or email, or chat…)

There’s no denying that many of the above messages are important. Most are desirable in some way: who doesn’t want to hear about the school’s successes, or have a chance to curry favour with the pupils by taking a hilarious “extreme reading” picture? Some are extremely important (but perhaps not the ones that say they are important). Some are definitely urgent, but again perhaps not those marked as such. Some are time-bounded, having an importance that is fleeting, so reading them even 30 minutes too late renders them completely without value (sorry Rylan) and therefore a waste of the recipients’ time.

Screenshot of some of the email messages that are listed in the blog text.

And we should not underestimate the wasted time. A single email sent to all staff in a big school could cost 2 man-hours altogether just to read and discard it. Consider how much staff time is lost dealing with the list above, every day, 195 days per year?

The problem with email in schools is that it is often the only communication channel everyone uses, it’s quick and easy to use, and therefore it gets used for everything. Untamed, email use spirals out of control and the truly important messages get drowned out by the “lost kit” and “bake sale” emails. The signal is drowned out by the noise. We need to tackle the flood of emails above, but how?

Too often, organisations impose a top-down approach to email noise, blaming the medium and the messengers, rather than recognising a systems problem. All of the above emails have some intrinsic value, but email treats them all the same, presenting them to the recipients in chronological order, the “importance” flag largely unused and the senders employing ALL CAPS exhortations to encourage you to read theirs first. The receiver has little chance of knowing which ones are really important to them, so they have no choice but to read them all, or risk being out of the loop. In a toxic organisation, the latter can be a real issue, “I sent you this last week, didn’t you read it?” is a conversation nobody needs.

We need to start asking where emails are coming from, if we are really to tackle the issue at source. And we need to start using other channels of communication where appropriate. Only then will we solve the systems problem of email overload.

Workflows

Each email above should be considered as a process within a bigger process, the workflow that gives rise to the need for communication. For example, “lost bag” emails belong to a lost-property workflow, which might originate with a child or parent reporting a lost item. If you implement a robust lost property process wherein staff are encouraged to take found items promptly to the lost property officer, maybe assign a student ambassador to look in the likely places if really necessary, but ask staff never to chase lost property by email again and firmly deal with transgressors, explaining the cost to everyone of “all staff” emails.

Some workflows should use the school’s software designed specially for the task. Your school’s MIS (SIMS, Arbor, Bromcom etc.) is designed for collecting and presenting pupil data. If your behaviour workflow includes any emails, e.g. “Hi there, you’ve given pupil A a score of 4 for behaviour, can you explain why, was it classroom behaviour or lack of homework or something else?” then your data collection sheet wasn’t fit for purpose: either split that “4” into two or more values, one that means homework and one that means classroom behaviour, or better still, use the MIS’s points system to allow staff to record behaviour and merit points throughout the year and get rid of behaviour data drops altogether!

Microsoft 365 and Google Suite both provide productivity tools such as chat (instant messaging), internal websites, shared documents and the ability to collaborate on documents. All of these can be considered communication channels that have advantages over email. Train your staff to be confident with these tools and explain how they might be used to improve communications (and reduce email).

Take a sample of emails (like the list above) and categorise them into workflows, then redesign the workflows to remove as much use of email as possible. I share some ideas how to do this on my Sway here.

Advertisements

On “Schedule Send” and timed bans…

I’m not a fan of the idea we should prevent staff from sending emails outside of work hours. Many parents and carers choose to front-load their days and work from 5am, or work in the evening after their children have gone to bed, so an email ban “out of hours” takes this agency away from adults who really should be trusted with their own time management. We should instead consider the reasons why staff don’t like receiving emails out of hours. Often the email is a source of stress because it requires urgent action that was not planned in. If that’s the case, the issue is with the workflow that generated that urgent action, and I urge you to re-assess your processes and prevent such unexpected workload spikes.

And take the advice in my Sway above on right audience, right channel and right content, and your communications will disturb fewer people and feel less threatening. Embed a culture of “I send when convenient to me, you reply when convenient to you” and model it as leaders, and the “dread” of email will subside.

Finally, it’s vital that staff know how to turn off notifications and use Do Not Disturb on their devices, so they are not pinging out of hours. Do this anyway on all school devices, except for the Oncall channel, your staff will thank you!

Internal communications are the lifeblood of an organisation but can also stifle it’s effectiveness, submerging people in information overload and causing anxiety and overwork. With systems thinking: dealing with workflows to move communications to the right channel or getting rid of them altogether, you can give your staff more agency over their jobs and reduce distractions so they can be more effective. And you might just improve morale and teamwork in the process.

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!
Categories
coaching general leadership teaching and learning

Out of Control.

Teaching is hard. But not for the obvious reasons, those that are well-known to novices and non-teachers like long hours, excessive planning and marking, dealing with behaviour that detract from its many joys such as seeing young people grow, develop, experience “lightbulb moments” of realisation.

Teaching’s hard because we always have a nagging feeling there is something more important we should be doing, and usually there is, but we can’t get to it because of all the planning, marking and behaviour management. We know there is higher-value work, and work that would be more enjoyable or fulfilling such as really thinking deeply about curriculum or planning a bespoke lesson based on serious analysis of some assessed work. Making those positive calls home you always promised you would do, or properly watching some training videos that improve your pedagogy, observing other teachers or being coached and putting into practice everything you learned.

But we rarely get time for any of this. As teachers we are constantly living a fiction: that we will eventually get time for the good stuff. Every single week, we fool ourselves that “next week will be less busy”…

Sadly this nagging feeling of rummaging around in the weeds and finding occasional sparkly gems, but wishing you could rise above it all and live in the sunlight is what eventually causes burnout: unmanageable stress, anxiety or other mental health issues, and then good people leave the profession.

Studies show that autonomy is important in job satisfaction:

Teachers’ perceived influence over their professional development goal setting is the area most associated with higher job satisfaction and a greater intention to stay in teaching. The average teacher reports a lower level of autonomy compared to similar professionals.

NFER Research, link

Last year the UK’s social research app TeacherTapp reported that only 1 in 3 Primary teachers reported having enough autonomy. And the TES reported in 2020, pre-pandemic, that teachers rank second-lowest (just above healthcare professionals) out of 11 professions for autonomy.

Which is a round-about way of saying: I understand why a colleague left this note on my laptop last September, why I am not bitter about it, and why it made me reflect so deeply on my own autonomy.

A yellow post-it note sits on a laptop keyboard with the words "There is a pencil missing" and a sad face emoji written on in pencil.

I had been covering a lesson in his classroom, and realised I was on playground duty immediately afterwards, so I collected in the pencils, tidied up as best I could in 30 seconds and ran out to do my duty. Just 25 minutes later I returned to gather my things to find this accusing note. Of course I was cross at first: I’d not stopped all day at this point, lost a “free” to a difficult cover and not yet had my lunch, and I thought it was a bit unnecessary: could he not be a bit more understanding? Nobody really wants to cover lessons but we know it’s part of the job and we do our best to look after our colleagues’ classrooms, but nobody’s perfect (don’t get me started on the mess my Computing classroom has been left in previously).

But then I remembered the importance of autonomy, and how lacking in it most teachers are. I remembered this scene about autonomy from “You’ve Got Mail” (which is worth watching just for the banging Cranberries track “Dreams” playing as Joe enters the coffee shop…)

The whole purpose of places like Starbucks is for people with no decision-making ability whatsoever to make six decisions just to buy one cup of coffee. Short, tall, light, dark, caf, decaf, low-fat, non-fat, etc. So people who don’t know what the hell they’re doing or who on earth they are can, for only $2.95, get not just a cup of coffee but an absolutely defining sense of self: Tall. Decaf. Cappuccino.

Nora Ephron’s script for “You’ve Got Mail”, Starbucks scene, Tom Hanks’ character Joe Fox speaking.

My pencil-counting colleague was “doing a Starbucks”. In a job severely lacking in autonomy, one thing he can control (most days) is the equipment in his classroom. He can count out the pencils and count them back in. I’m sure there are many other aspects of his job he has control over, but just maybe, returning to find a box of pencils with a gap where an HB should be was the last straw that day. I forgave him but the incident sparked reflection.

Possibly the pencil-missing-post-it cover lesson acted as my toothpick instructions moment. Douglas Adams’ marine biologist character “Wonko the Sane” retired to a house in California he called “Outside the Asylum” upon reading instructions on a pack of toothpicks…

‘It seemed to me,’ said Wonko the Sane, ‘that any civilization that had so far lost its head as to need to include a set of detailed instructions for use in a package of toothpicks, was no longer a civilization in which I could live and stay sane.’

Douglas Adams, So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish

It’s certainly true that I handed my notice in four weeks later. What my post-it-author colleague felt that day I’ll never know, I simply dropped off a couple of similar pencils on his vacant desk at the end of the day and we never spoke about it. (Sure, I wrote and deleted several emails, but never sent them, which I was glad about soon after).

So if you’re in a position of power in school, and you wish to improve well-being, maybe stop doing “surface-level” things like cake in the staffroom or yoga sessions (and do not make any “well-being” sessions mandatory). Deliver on autonomy, which in turn means cutting things out of the calendar to make room for middle-leaders to do high-value stuff. Stop mandating lesson structures and slide layouts (but do share good practice around this that others can learn from). Ask your staff what they think, they are all graduate professionals after all, let them bring themselves into the job.

And just maybe, with more autonomy, teachers won’t feel the need to write passive-aggressive notes to colleagues, or feel the need to leave, and go live Outside the Asylum. 😎

If you like this blog, my books are available at the home page here. Or…

If you are grateful for my blog, please buy my books here or buy me a coffee at ko-fi.com/mraharrisoncs, thanks!